Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19862351›Full record

ArticlePhysica D. Nonlinear phenomena2009

Variational Bayesian identification and prediction of stochastic nonlinear dynamic causal models.

J Daunizeau, K J Friston, S J Kiebel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica D. Nonlinear phenomena, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Better get back to work: a role for motor beta desynchronization in incentive motivation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Network Diffusion Modeling in Computational Neuroscience.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  5. BSD: A Bayesian Framework for Parametric Models of Neural Spectra.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Linking fast and slow: The case for generative models.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Computational and Neurobiological Substrates of Cost-Benefit Integration in Altruistic Helping Decision.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Neuronal Sequence Models for Bayesian Online Inference.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J DaunizeauWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College, London, United Kingdom.
K J Friston
S J Kiebel

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a general variational Bayesian approach for approximate inference on nonlinear stochastic dynamic models. This scheme extends established approximate inference on hidden-states to cover: (i) nonlinear evolution and observation functions, (ii) unknown parameters and (precision) hyperparameters and (iii) model comparison and prediction under uncertainty. Model identification or inversion entails the estimation of the marginal likelihood or evidence of a model. This difficult integration problem can be finessed by optimising a free-energy bound on the evidence using results from variational calculus. This yields a deterministic update scheme that optimises an approximation to the posterior density on the unknown model variables. We derive such a variational Bayesian scheme in the context of nonlinear stochastic dynamic hierarchical models, for both model identification and time-series prediction. The computational complexity of the scheme is comparable to that of an extended Kalman filter, which is critical when inverting high dimensional models or long time-series. Using Monte-Carlo simulations, we assess the estimation efficiency of this variational Bayesian approach using three stochastic variants of chaotic dynamic systems. We also demonstrate the model comparison capabilities of the method, its self-consistency and its predictive power.

Identifiers

PMID19862351
PMCPMC2767160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.