Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19859816›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2010

Mathematical modeling and the epidemiological research process.

Mikayla C Chubb, Kathryn H Jacobsen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikayla C ChubbDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive MS 5B7, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA.
Kathryn H Jacobsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The authors of this paper advocate for the expanded use of mathematical models in epidemiology and provide an overview of the principles of mathematical modeling. Mathematical models can be used throughout the epidemiological research process. Initially they may help to refine study questions by visually expressing complex systems, directing literature searches, and identifying sensitive variables. In the study design phase, models can be used to test sampling strategies, to estimate sample size and power, and to predict outcomes for studies impractical due to time or ethical considerations. Once data are collected, models can assist in the interpretation of results, the exploration of causal pathways, and the combined analysis of data from multiple sources. Finally, models are commonly used in the process of applying research findings to public health practice by estimating population risk, predicting the effects of interventions, and contributing to the evaluation of ongoing programs. Mathematical modeling has the potential to make significant contributions to the field of epidemiology by enhancing the research process, serving as a tool for communicating findings to policymakers, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic StudiesModels, StatisticalEpidemiologic Research DesignHumansPublic Health

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.