Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19859688›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2010

[Second-line therapy of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A].

B Amend, D Castro-Diaz, E Chartier-Kastler, D De Ridder, K Everaert, M Spinelli, P van Kereebroeck, K-D Sievert

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

B AmendKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum, Tübingen.
D Castro-Diaz
E Chartier-Kastler
D De Ridder
K Everaert
M Spinelli
P van Kereebroeck
K-D Sievert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The syndrome of idiopathic overactive bladder (I-OAB) impairs quality of life for the affected individuals. Conservative treatment options such as antimuscarinics are not always effective, and resulting side effects can lead the patient to stop treatment. In recently years, minimally invasive and reversible sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A have become available. Currently, the approved treatment option for I-OAB that is recommended by the International Consultation on Incontinence is sacral neuromodulation by InterStim therapy. This article gives an overview of the present clinical evidence on the effectiveness and reliability of these two treatment modalities as well as the current significance of sacral neuromodulation and botulinum toxin A for the second-line treatment of adult I-OAB.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyBotulinum Toxins, Type AHumansImplantable NeurostimulatorsInjectionsMuscle, SmoothNeuromuscular AgentsSacrococcygeal RegionUrinary Bladder, OveractiveBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.