Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19859073›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2010

Residual microvascular risk in diabetes: unmet needs and future directions.

Paola Fioretto, Paul M Dodson, Dan Ziegler, Robert S Rosenson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond the Glycaemic Control of Dapagliflozin: Microangiopathy and Non-classical Complications.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paola FiorettoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. paola.fioretto@unipd.it
Paul M Dodson
Dan Ziegler
Robert S Rosenson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burden of microvascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to escalate worldwide. Current standards of care reduce but do not eliminate the risk of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy or neuropathy in these patients. Correction of atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is characterized by elevated triglyceride levels and low levels of HDL cholesterol, might provide additional benefit. Whereas promising data have been published with respect to fibrate therapy for maculopathy, fenofibrate for diabetic retinopathy, and statin or fibrate therapy for diabetic nephropathy, further studies are warranted to define optimal management strategies for reducing the residual microvascular risk. Such strategies are especially relevant in cases of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, where even optimal care fails to affect disease progression. Identification of those factors that are most relevant to residual diabetes-related microvascular risk is a priority of an ongoing multinational epidemiological study. In this Review, we highlight an urgent need to address the issue of microvascular residual risk in patients with or at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseCapillariesCoronary AngiographyDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLipidsBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsLipids

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.