Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19858485›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Hypersensitivity to contact inhibition provides a clue to cancer resistance of naked mole-rat.

Andrei Seluanov, Christopher Hine, Jorge Azpurua, Marina Feigenson, Michael Bozzella, Zhiyong Mao, Kenneth C Catania, Vera Gorbunova

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 197 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
197citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

197 citing papers in PubMed, 396 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionary genetics of ageing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of naked mole-rat thermogenesis and its potential to maintain euthermia in response to cold.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Do turtles get cancer?Bioscience · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

137 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrei SeluanovDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Christopher Hine
Jorge Azpurua
Marina Feigenson
Michael Bozzella
Zhiyong Mao
Kenneth C Catania
Vera Gorbunova
University of Rochester · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The naked mole-rat is the longest living rodent with a maximum lifespan exceeding 28 years. In addition to its longevity, naked mole-rats have an extraordinary resistance to cancer as tumors have never been observed in these rodents. Furthermore, we show that a combination of activated Ras and SV40 LT fails to induce robust anchorage-independent growth in naked mole-rat cells, while it readily transforms mouse fibroblasts. The mechanisms responsible for the cancer resistance of naked mole-rats were unknown. Here we show that naked mole-rat fibroblasts display hypersensitivity to contact inhibition, a phenomenon we termed "early contact inhibition." Contact inhibition is a key anticancer mechanism that arrests cell division when cells reach a high density. In cell culture, naked mole-rat fibroblasts arrest at a much lower density than those from a mouse. We demonstrate that early contact inhibition requires the activity of p53 and pRb tumor suppressor pathways. Inactivation of both p53 and pRb attenuates early contact inhibition. Contact inhibition in human and mouse is triggered by the induction of p27(Kip1). In contrast, early contact inhibition in naked mole-rat is associated with the induction of p16(Ink4a). Furthermore, we show that the roles of p16(Ink4a) and p27(Kip1) in the control of contact inhibition became temporally separated in this species: the early contact inhibition is controlled by p16(Ink4a), and regular contact inhibition is controlled by p27(Kip1). We propose that the additional layer of protection conferred by two-tiered contact inhibition contributes to the remarkable tumor resistance of the naked mole-rat.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDisease Models, AnimalLongevityMole RatsAnimalsAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingCell CommunicationCell ProliferationCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27FibroblastsHumansMiceNeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retinoblastoma ProteinAntigens, Polyomavirus TransformingCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Retinoblastoma ProteinTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID19858485
PMCPMC2780760
OpenAlexW1989589708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.