Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19858397›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2009

Consensus report of the national cancer institute clinical trials planning meeting on pancreas cancer treatment.

Philip A Philip, Margaret Mooney, Deborah Jaffe, Gail Eckhardt, Malcolm Moore, Neal Meropol, Leisha Emens, Eileen O'Reilly, Murray Korc, Lee Ellis and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03871790 (Peptide-based Immunization for Colon- and Pancreas-carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 113 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03871790 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Peptide-based Immunization for Colon- and Pancreas-carcinoma (PICOP-GLOBAL): An International, Multicenter Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorCENTOGENE GmbH RostockRan2019 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsColon Neoplasm, Colon Adenocarcinoma, Colon Cancer, Colo-rectal Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2010
    Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Pancreatic Cancer KRAS Breakthrough: Drug Graveyard No More.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philip A PhilipKarmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. philipp@karmanos.org
Margaret Mooney
Deborah Jaffe
Gail Eckhardt
Malcolm Moore
Neal Meropol
Leisha Emens
Eileen O'Reilly
Murray Korc
Lee Ellis
Jacqueline Benedetti
Mace Rothenberg
Christopher Willett
Margaret Tempero
Andrew Lowy
James Abbruzzese
Diane Simeone
Sunil Hingorani
Jordan Berlin
Joel Tepper
Ontario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer mortality, despite significant improvements in diagnostic imaging and operative mortality rates. The 5-year survival rate remains less than 5% because of microscopic or gross metastatic disease at time of diagnosis. The Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in pancreatic cancer was convened by the National Cancer Institute's Gastrointestinal Cancer Steering Committee to discuss the integration of basic and clinical knowledge in the design of clinical trials in PDAC. Major emphasis was placed on the enhancement of research to identify and validate the relevant targets and molecular pathways in PDAC, cancer stem cells, and the microenvironment. Emphasis was also placed on developing rational combinations of targeted agents and the development of predictive biomarkers to assist selection of patient subsets. The development of preclinical tumor models that are better predictive of human PDAC must be supported with wider availability to the research community. Phase III clinical trials should be implemented only if there is a meaningful clinical signal of efficacy and safety in the phase II setting. The emphasis must therefore be on performing well-designed phase II studies with uniform sets of basic entry and evaluation criteria with survival as a primary endpoint. Patients with either metastatic or locally advanced PDAC must be studied separately.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDisease Models, AnimalDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiceNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Neoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID19858397
PMCPMC7587401
OpenAlexW2133707964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.