Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19858363›Full record

ArticleGenome research2010

Detection of nonneutral substitution rates on mammalian phylogenies.

Katherine S Pollard, Melissa J Hubisz, Kate R Rosenbloom, Adam Siepel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,523 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,523citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,523 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Visualization of RNA Structures and Functional Annotations Using ArcPlot.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Toward Advanced Quantitative Prediction of Missense Variant Effects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. PCBP2 facilitates miR-93-5p-mediated repression ofMolecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

1,463 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine S PollardGladstone Institutes, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94158, USA. kpollard@gladstone.ucsf.edu
Melissa J Hubisz
Kate R Rosenbloom
Adam Siepel

Funding

What Made Us Human?R01GM082901 · NIGMS · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI POLLARD, KATHERINE S. · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM82901NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082901
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods for detecting nucleotide substitution rates that are faster or slower than expected under neutral drift are widely used to identify candidate functional elements in genomic sequences. However, most existing methods consider either reductions (conservation) or increases (acceleration) in rate but not both, or assume that selection acts uniformly across the branches of a phylogeny. Here we examine the more general problem of detecting departures from the neutral rate of substitution in either direction, possibly in a clade-specific manner. We consider four statistical, phylogenetic tests for addressing this problem: a likelihood ratio test, a score test, a test based on exact distributions of numbers of substitutions, and the genomic evolutionary rate profiling (GERP) test. All four tests have been implemented in a freely available program called phyloP. Based on extensive simulation experiments, these tests are remarkably similar in statistical power. With 36 mammalian species, they all appear to be capable of fairly good sensitivity with low false-positive rates in detecting strong selection at individual nucleotides, moderate selection in 3-bp elements, and weaker or clade-specific selection in longer elements. By applying phyloP to mammalian multiple alignments from the ENCODE project, we shed light on patterns of conservation/acceleration in known and predicted functional elements, approximate fractions of sites subject to constraint, and differences in clade-specific selection in the primate and glires clades. We also describe new "Conservation" tracks in the UCSC Genome Browser that display both phyloP and phastCons scores for genome-wide alignments of 44 vertebrate species.

Indexed as

Base SequenceEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySelection, GeneticAnimalsComputer SimulationConserved SequenceHumansLikelihood FunctionsMammalsModels, GeneticModels, StatisticalPrimatesSequence AlignmentSoftwareSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19858363
PMCPMC2798823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.