Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19857985›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2009

Light activation as a method of regulating and studying gene expression.

Alexander Deiters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. RNA Control via Redox-Responsive Acylation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cyanine Photocages Enable Spatial Control of Inducible Cre-Mediated Recombination.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander DeitersNorth Carolina State University, Department of Chemistry, Raleigh, NC 27695-8204, USA. alex_deiters@ncsu.edu
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Switchable Systems for Spatio-Temporal Control of Gene Expression in ZebrafishR01GM079114 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DEITERS, ALEXANDER · 2007 to 2011
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079114NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM079114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, several advances have been made in the activation and deactivation of gene expression using light. These developments are based on the application of small molecule inducers of gene expression, antisense- or RNA interference-mediated gene silencing, and the photochemical control of proteins regulating gene function. The majority of the examples employ a classical 'caging technology', through the chemical installation of a light-removable protecting group on the biological molecule (small molecule, oligonucleotide, or protein) of interest and rendering it inactive. UV light irradiation then removes the caging group and activates the molecule, enabling control over gene activity with high spatial and temporal resolution.

Indexed as

LightAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansOligonucleotidesProteinsOligonucleotidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID19857985
PMCPMC2787999
OpenAlexW1964890497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.