Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19857387›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2009

Antibiotic consideration in bacterial vaginosis.

Jack D Sobel

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02863536 (A Multicenter, Open Label, Non-comparative, 3 Months Study to Assess the Performance and Safety of the New Medical Device Polybactum® in Reducing the Frequency of Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02863536 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Multicenter, Open Label, Non-comparative, 3 Months Study to Assess the Performance and Safety of the New Medical Device Polybactum® in Reducing the Frequency of Recurrent Bacterial Vaginosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEffik Italia S.p.A.Ran2016 to 2018Enrolled56ConditionsBacterial VaginosisArmsPolybactum®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jack D SobelDivision of Infectious Diseases, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 3990 John R Street, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. orna.reich@gmail.com
Wayne State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a syndrome characterized by the loss of indigenous vaginal lactobacilli and massive polymicrobial anaerobic vaginal overgrowth of elusive etiology. Although progress has occurred in defining the composition of the vaginal microbiome using DNA amplifications, rapidly accumulating data have not resulted in therapeutic advantage. Treatment options remain limited and outcome often unsatisfactory, particularly regarding the frequent recurrence of symptomatic disease, leading to enormous frustration among patients and practitioners. This review does not address the important issues of transmission, diagnosis, and complications of BV, but focuses on antimicrobial activity of current drugs and their limitations in vitro and in vivo. Recognizing these limitations should allow for either development of new antibiotics or for innovative use of currently available drugs in new study protocols.

Identifiers

PMID19857387
OpenAlexW2045424606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.