Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19857261›Full record

ArticleBMC structural biology2009

Partially-supervised protein subclass discovery with simultaneous annotation of functional residues.

Benjamin Georgi, Jörg Schultz, Alexander Schliep

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC structural biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin GeorgiMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Dept, of Computational Molecular Biology, Ihnestrasse 73, 14195 Berlin, Germany. bgeorgi@mail.med.upenn.edu
Jörg Schultz
Alexander Schliep
Max Planck Society · DEUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of functional subfamilies of protein domain families and the identification of the residues which determine substrate specificity is an important question in the analysis of protein domains. One way to address this question is the use of clustering methods for protein sequence data and approaches to predict functional residues based on such clusterings. The locations of putative functional residues in known protein structures provide insights into how different substrate specificities are reflected on the protein structure level.

resultsWe have developed an extension of the context-specific independence mixture model clustering framework which allows for the integration of experimental data. As these are usually known only for a few proteins, our algorithm implements a partially-supervised learning approach. We discover domain subfamilies and predict functional residues for four protein domain families: phosphatases, pyridoxal dependent decarboxylases, WW and SH3 domains to demonstrate the usefulness of our approach.

conclusionThe partially-supervised clustering revealed biologically meaningful subfamilies even for highly heterogeneous domains and the predicted functional residues provide insights into the basis of the different substrate specificities.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceCluster AnalysisDatabases, ProteinProteinsProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesSequence Alignmentsrc Homology DomainsSubstrate SpecificityProteinsProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

Identifiers

PMID19857261
PMCPMC2777906
OpenAlexW1987120508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.