Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19856963›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2009

The structural basis of pregnane X receptor binding promiscuity.

Chi-Ho Ngan, Dmitri Beglov, Aleksandra N Rudnitskaya, Dima Kozakov, David J Waxman, Sandor Vajda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging between Structure-Based and Data-Driven Affinity Prediction.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structure-guided approach to modulate small molecule binding to a promiscuous ligand-activated protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pregnane X Receptor and the Gut-Liver Axis: A Recent Update.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sequence Variations in pxr (nr1i2) From Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Strains Affect Nuclear Receptor Function.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chi-Ho NganDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Dmitri Beglov
Aleksandra N Rudnitskaya
Dima Kozakov
David J Waxman
Sandor Vajda
University of Massachusetts Boston · US

Funding

Training CoreP42ES007381 · NIEHS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI HAHN, MARK E · 1995 to 2019
$46.1M
Computational mapping of proteins for the binding of ligandsR01GM064700 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI VAJDA, SANDOR · 2003 to 2015
$4.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES007381NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES07381NIGMS NIH HHS GM64700NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The steroid and xenobiotic-responsive human pregnane X receptor (PXR) binds a broad range of structurally diverse compounds. The structures of the apo and ligand-bound forms of PXR are very similar, in contrast to most promiscuous proteins that generally adapt their shape to different ligands. We investigated the structural origins of PXR's recognition promiscuity using computational solvent mapping, a technique developed for the identification and characterization of hot spots, i.e., regions of the protein surface that are major contributors to the binding free energy. Results reveal that the smooth and nearly spherical binding site of PXR has a well-defined hot spot structure, with four hot spots located on four different sides of the pocket and a fifth close to its center. Three of these hot spots are already present in the ligand-free protein. The most important hot spot is defined by three structurally and sequentially conserved residues, W299, F288, and Y306. This largely hydrophobic site is not very specific and interacts with all known PXR ligands. Depending on their sizes and shapes, individual PXR ligands extend into two, three, or four more hot spot regions. The large number of potential arrangements within the binding site explains why PXR is able to accommodate a large variety of compounds. All five hot spots include at least one important residue, which is conserved in all mammalian PXRs, suggesting that the hot spot locations have remained largely invariant during mammalian evolution. The same side chains also show a high level of structural conservation across hPXR structures. However, each of the hPXR hot spots also includes residues with moveable side chains, further increasing the size variation in ligands that PXR can bind. Results also suggest a unique signal transduction mechanism between the PXR homodimerization interface and its coactivator binding site.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceBinding SitesDimerizationHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLigandsMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPregnane X ReceptorProtein ConformationReceptors, SteroidStructure-Activity RelationshipSubstrate SpecificityLigandsPeptidesPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, Steroid

Identifiers

PMID19856963
PMCPMC2789303
OpenAlexW2162356127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.