ArticleJournal of molecular recognition : JMR
Preferred drifting along the DNA major groove and cooperative anchoring of the p53 core domain: mechanisms and scenarios.
Article in Journal of molecular recognition : JMR. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roles of computational modelling in understanding p53 structure, biology, and its therapeutic targeting.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Structural effects of the L145Q, V157F, and R282W cancer-associated mutations in the p53 DNA-binding core domain.Biochemistry · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
While the importance of specific p53-DNA binding is broadly accepted, the recognition process is still not fully understood. Figuring out the initial tetrameric p53-DNA association and the swift and cooperative search for specific binding sites is crucial for understanding the transactivation mechanism and selectivity. To gain insight into the p53-DNA binding process, here we have carried out explicit solvent molecular dynamic (MD) simulations of several p53 core domain-DNA conformations with the p53 and the DNA separated by varying distances. p53 approached the DNA, bound non-specifically, and quickly drifted along the DNA surface to find the major groove, cooperatively anchoring in a way similar to the specific binding observed in the crystal structure. Electrostatics was the major driving force behind the p53 movement. Mechanistically, this is a cooperative process: key residues, particularly Lys120 and Arg280 acted as sensors; upon finding their hydrogen-bonding partners, they lock in, anchoring p53 into the major groove. Concomitantly, the DNA adopted a conformation that facilitated p53 easy access. The initial non-specific core domain-DNA contacts assist in shifting the DNA and the p53 substrates toward conformations "ready" for specific major groove binding, with subsequent optimization of the interactions. This work is an invited contribution for the special issue of the Journal of Molecular Recognition dedicated to Professor Martin Karplus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.