Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19856109›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of behavioral medicine2010

Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis.

Shamini Jain, Paul J Mills

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Reiki for depression and anxiety.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biofield Therapies: Guidelines for Reporting Clinical Trials.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Quantifying Biofield Therapy through Biophoton Emission in a Cellular Model.Journal of scientific exploration : a publication of the Society for Scientific Exploration · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Bioenergy and Breast Cancer: A Report on Tumor Growth and Metastasis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Biofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts.Global advances in health and medicine · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Peer consultants: Missing link in the treatment of chronic pain.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shamini JainUCLA Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA. sjain@ucsd.edu
Paul J Mills

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiofield therapies (such as Reiki, therapeutic touch, and healing touch) are complementary medicine modalities that remain controversial and are utilized by a significant number of patients, with little information regarding their efficacy. PURPOSE: This systematic review examines 66 clinical studies with a variety of biofield therapies in different patient populations.

methodWe conducted a quality assessment as well as a best evidence synthesis approach to examine evidence for biofield therapies in relevant outcomes for different clinical populations.

resultsStudies overall are of medium quality, and generally meet minimum standards for validity of inferences. Biofield therapies show strong evidence for reducing pain intensity in pain populations, and moderate evidence for reducing pain intensity hospitalized and cancer populations. There is moderate evidence for decreasing negative behavioral symptoms in dementia and moderate evidence for decreasing anxiety for hospitalized populations. There is equivocal evidence for biofield therapies' effects on fatigue and quality of life for cancer patients, as well as for comprehensive pain outcomes and affect in pain patients, and for decreasing anxiety in cardiovascular patients.

conclusionThere is a need for further high-quality studies in this area. Implications and future research directions are discussed.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain ManagementChronic DiseaseElectromagnetic PhenomenaHolistic HealthHumansNeoplasmsQiQuality Assurance, Health CareTherapeutic Touch

Identifiers

PMID19856109
PMCPMC2816237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.