Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19855964›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2010

Homeostasis of peripheral FoxP3(+) CD4 (+) regulatory T cells in patients with early and late stage breast cancer.

Andrew J Rech, Rosemarie Mick, David E Kaplan, Kyong-Mi Chang, Susan M Domchek, Robert H Vonderheide

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Molecular and clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical Impact of Regulatory T cells (Treg) in Cancer and HIV.Cancer microenvironment : official journal of the International Cancer Microenvironment Society · 2015
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Effects of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the frequency and function of regulatory T cells in patients with head and neck cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J RechAbramson Family Cancer Research Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 551 BRB II/III, 421 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Rosemarie Mick
David E Kaplan
Kyong-Mi Chang
Susan M Domchek
Robert H Vonderheide
University of Pennsylvania · USCancer Research Institute · USVeterans Health Administration · US

Funding

Immunoregulation and immunotherapy of breast cancerR01CA111377 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VONDERHEIDE, ROBERT H · 2005 to 2012
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FoxP3( + ) CD4( + ) regulatory T cells (Tregs) are important mediators of peripheral immune tolerance, acting via multiple mechanisms to suppress cellular immunity including antitumor responses. Although therapeutic strategies have been proposed to deplete Tregs in patients with breast cancer and other malignancies, dynamic changes in the Treg compartment as a function of stage and treatment of breast cancer remain poorly understood. Here, we evaluated peripheral blood CD4(+) T cells and FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells from 45 patients with early or late stage breast cancer and compared percentages, absolute counts, and Treg function to those from healthy volunteers (HV) of comparable age. Patients having completed adjuvant chemotherapy and patients with metastatic cancer exhibited significantly lower absolute CD4 counts and significantly higher percentages of FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells. In contrast, the absolute counts of circulating FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells did not differ significantly among early stage patients, late stage patients, or HV. Functionally, FoxP3(+) CD4(+) T cells from all donor groups similarly expressed CTLA-4 and failed to secrete IFN-gamma in response to stimulation. Thus, although Tregs comprise an increased percentage of circulating CD4(+) T cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer and patients in remission after completing the adjuvant chemotherapy, the systemic Treg pool, as measured by absolute counts, appears relatively constant regardless of disease stage or treatment status. Total CD4(+) T cell counts are not constant, however, suggesting that homeostatic mechanisms, or susceptibility to cytotoxic or malignant insults, fundamentally differ for regulatory and non-regulatory CD4(+) T cells.

Indexed as

HomeostasisAntigens, CDBreast NeoplasmsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesChemotherapy, AdjuvantCTLA-4 AntigenFemaleFlow CytometryForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansImmune ToleranceInterferon-gammaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAntigens, CDCTLA-4 AntigenCTLA4 protein, humanForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, humanInterferon-gamma

Identifiers

PMID19855964
PMCPMC11030825
OpenAlexW2070662116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.