Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19855821›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2009

The past and future of tuberculosis research.

Iñaki Comas, Sebastien Gagneux

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genetic diversity ofHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spoligotyping of Clinical Isolates ofFrontiers in public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Multispacer Sequence Typing forFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2018
    Review

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iñaki ComasDivision of Mycobacterial Research, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, London, UK.
Sebastien Gagneux

Funding

POPULATION-BASED MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF TUBERCULOSISR01AI034238 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOPEWELL, PHILIP C · 1993 to 2010
$9.3M
Medical Research Council MC_U117588500NIAID NIH HHS AI034238NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034238PHS HHS HHSN266200700022C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renewed efforts in tuberculosis (TB) research have led to important new insights into the biology and epidemiology of this devastating disease. Yet, in the face of the modern epidemics of HIV/AIDS, diabetes, and multidrug resistance--all of which contribute to susceptibility to TB--global control of the disease will remain a formidable challenge for years to come. New high-throughput genomics technologies are already contributing to studies of TB's epidemiology, comparative genomics, evolution, and host-pathogen interaction. We argue here, however, that new multidisciplinary approaches--especially the integration of epidemiology with systems biology in what we call "systems epidemiology"--will be required to eliminate TB.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlGenomicsHumansMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID19855821
PMCPMC2745564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.