Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19855009›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2009

Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition.

Michael Richter, Ramon Rosselló-Móra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,883 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,883citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,883 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. First human isolation ofNew microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2,823 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael RichterMarine Microbiology Group, Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (CSIC-UIB), E-07190 Esporles, Spain.
Ramon Rosselló-Móra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) has been used for nearly 50 years as the gold standard for prokaryotic species circumscriptions at the genomic level. It has been the only taxonomic method that offered a numerical and relatively stable species boundary, and its use has had a paramount influence on how the current classification has been constructed. However, now, in the era of genomics, DDH appears to be an outdated method for classification that needs to be substituted. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between two genomes seems the most promising method since it mirrors DDH closely. Here we examine the work package JSpecies as a user-friendly, biologist-oriented interface to calculate ANI and the correlation of the tetranucleotide signatures between pairwise genomic comparisons. The results agreed with the use of ANI to substitute DDH, with a narrowed boundary that could be set at approximately 95-96%. In addition, the JSpecies package implemented the tetranucleotide signature correlation index, an alignment-free parameter that generally correlates with ANI and that can be of help in deciding when a given pair of organisms should be classified in the same species. Moreover, for taxonomic purposes, the analyses can be produced by simply randomly sequencing at least 20% of the genome of the query strains rather than obtaining their full sequence.

Indexed as

Sequence HomologySoftwareArchaeaBacteriaClassificationComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticGenomicsNucleotidesSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityNucleotides

Identifiers

PMID19855009
PMCPMC2776425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.