Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19854678›Full record

ReviewTrends in parasitology2009

The global cysteine peptidase landscape in parasites.

Holly J Atkinson, Patricia C Babbitt, Mohammed Sajid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in parasitology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Proteins of the Ciliated Protozoan ParasitePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Carbamoyl-RSC advances · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Holly J AtkinsonUCSF Graduate Program in Biological and Medical Informatics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158-2330, USA.
Patricia C Babbitt
Mohammed Sajid
Leiden University · NL

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS: PROTEIN SORTINGP41RR001081 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIN, THOMAS E · 1985 to 2011
$17.6M
Laying the Foundation of Genomic EnzymologyR01GM060595 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BABBITT, PATRICIA CLEMENT · 2000 to 2018
$5.4M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001081NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR-01081NIGMS NIH HHS GM60595NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of sequenced genomes has expanded the already sizeable population of cysteine peptidases from parasites. Characterization of a few of these enzymes has ascribed key roles to peptidases in parasite life cycles and has also shed light on mechanisms of pathogenesis. Here we discuss recent observations on the physiological activities of cysteine peptidases of parasitic organisms, paired with a global view of all cysteine peptidases from the MEROPS database grouped by similarity. This snapshot of the landscape of parasite cysteine peptidases is complex and highly populated, suggesting that expansion of research beyond the few 'model' parasite peptidases is now timely.

Indexed as

AnimalsApicomplexaCysteine ProteasesEuglenozoaGenetic VariationGenome, HelminthGenome, ProtozoanHelminthsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansParasitesCysteine Proteases

Identifiers

PMID19854678
PMCPMC3893884
OpenAlexW2005913713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.