Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19853241›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2009

The relationship between imputation error and statistical power in genetic association studies in diverse populations.

Lucy Huang, Chaolong Wang, Noah A Rosenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic variation in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy HuangCenter for Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, 2017 Palmer Commons, 100 Washtenaw Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Chaolong Wang
Noah A Rosenberg

Funding

Population-Genetic Studies for Association MappingR01GM081441 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROSENBERG, NOAH · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
Computational Statistic Approaches to Gene-Environment InteractionR01HL090564 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZOELLNER, SEBASTIAN · 2007 to 2009
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL090564NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype-imputation methods provide an essential technique for high-resolution genome-wide association (GWA) studies with millions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms. For optimal design and interpretation of imputation-based GWA studies, it is important to understand the connection between imputation error and power to detect associations at imputed markers. Here, using a 2x3 chi-square test, we describe a relationship between genotype-imputation error rates and the sample-size inflation required for achieving statistical power at an imputed marker equal to that obtained if genotypes at the marker were known with certainty. Surprisingly, typical imputation error rates (approximately 2%-6%) lead to a large increase in the required sample size (approximately 10%-60%), and in some African populations whose genotypes are particularly difficult to impute, the required sample-size increase is as high as approximately 30%-150%. In most populations, each 1% increase in imputation error leads to an increase of approximately 5%-13% in the sample size required for maintaining power. These results imply that in GWA sample-size calculations investigators will need to account for a potentially considerable loss of power from even low levels of imputation error and that development of additional genomic resources that decrease imputation error will translate into substantial reduction in the sample sizes needed for imputation-based detection of the variants that underlie complex human diseases.

Indexed as

Genetics, PopulationGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, StatisticalAllelesBlack PeopleCase-Control StudiesChi-Square DistributionGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenotypeHaplotypesHeterozygoteHomozygoteGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19853241
PMCPMC2775841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.