Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19852842›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2009

Quality control in microarray assessment of gene expression in human airway epithelium.

Tina Raman, Timothy P O'Connor, Neil R Hackett, Wei Wang, Ben-Gary Harvey, Marc A Attiyeh, David T Dang, Matthew Teater, Ronald G Crystal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stem/Progenitor Cells and Related Therapy in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Bioinformatic Analysis ofMembranes · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tina RamanDepartment of Genetic Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. geneticmedicine@med.cornell.edu
Timothy P O'Connor
Neil R Hackett
Wei Wang
Ben-Gary Harvey
Marc A Attiyeh
David T Dang
Matthew Teater
Ronald G Crystal

Funding

Role of Alveolar Macrophages in the Accelerated Emphysema of HIV-1 PositiveP50HL084936 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CRYSTAL, RONALD G · 2007 to 2011
$14.2M
Candidate Genes for Susceptibility to BronchitisR01HL074326 · NHLBI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI CRYSTAL, RONALD G · 2004 to 2007
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL084936NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL074326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroarray technology provides a powerful tool for defining gene expression profiles of airway epithelium that lend insight into the pathogenesis of human airway disorders. The focus of this study was to establish rigorous quality control parameters to ensure that microarray assessment of the airway epithelium is not confounded by experimental artifact. Samples (total n = 223) of trachea, large and small airway epithelium were collected by fiberoptic bronchoscopy of 144 individuals and hybridized to Affymetrix microarrays. The pre- and post-chip quality control (QC) criteria established, included: (1) RNA quality, assessed by RNA Integrity Number (RIN) > or = 7.0; (2) cRNA transcript integrity, assessed by signal intensity ratio of GAPDH 3' to 5' probe sets < or = 3.0; and (3) the multi-chip normalization scaling factor < or = 10.0.

resultsOf the 223 samples, all three criteria were assessed in 191; of these 184 (96.3%) passed all three criteria. For the remaining 32 samples, the RIN was not available, and only the other two criteria were used; of these 29 (90.6%) passed these two criteria. Correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons of expression levels for 100 maintenance genes in which at least one array failed the QC criteria (average Pearson r = 0.90 +/- 0.04) were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) than correlation coefficients for pairwise comparisons between arrays that passed the QC criteria (average Pearson r = 0.97 +/- 0.01). Inter-array variability was significantly decreased (p < 0.0001) among samples passing the QC criteria compared with samples failing the QC criteria.

conclusionBased on the aberrant maintenance gene data generated from samples failing the established QC criteria, we propose that the QC criteria outlined in this study can accurately distinguish high quality from low quality data, and can be used to delete poor quality microarray samples before proceeding to higher-order biological analyses and interpretation.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisQuality ControlRespiratory MucosaRNAGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate DehydrogenasesRNA

Identifiers

PMID19852842
PMCPMC2774870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.