Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19852829›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2009

Presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda: a randomized controlled trial.

Victoria Nakibuuka, Grace Ndeezi, Deborah Nakiboneka, Christopher M Ndugwa, James K Tumwine

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04844099 (Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine or Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Chemoprevention of Malaria in Children With Sickle Cell Anaemia in Eastern and Southern Africa), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04844099 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine or Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine for the Chemoprevention of Malaria in Children With Sickle Cell Anaemia in Eastern and Southern Africa: a Double Blind Randomised Trial (CHEMCHA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLiverpool School of Tropical MedicineRan2021 to 2023Enrolled723ConditionsSickle Cell Anemia in Children, MalariaArmsDihydroartemisinin Piperaquine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Intermittent preventive antimalarial treatment for children with anaemia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Mass drug administration for malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials and Phenotypes.Journal of tropical diseases & public health · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria NakibuukaDepartment of Paediatrics, Nsambya Hospital, PO Box 7146 Kampala, Uganda. nakibuukarv@yahoo.com
Grace Ndeezi
Deborah Nakiboneka
Christopher M Ndugwa
James K Tumwine
Makerere University · UGNsambya Hospital · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria carries high case fatality among children with sickle cell anaemia. In Uganda, chloroquine is used for prophylaxis in these children despite unacceptably high levels of resistance. Intermittent presumptive treatment with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) has shown great potential for reducing prevalence of malaria and anaemia among pregnant women and infants.

objectiveTo compare the efficacy of monthly SP presumptive treatment, versus weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis in children attending the Sickle Cell Clinic, Mulago Hospital.

methodsTwo hundred and forty two children with sickle cell anaemia were randomized to presumptive treatment with SP or weekly chloroquine for malaria prophylaxis. Active detection of malaria was made at each weekly visit to the clinic over one month. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of children with one malaria episode at one month follow-up. The secondary outcome measures included malaria-related admissions and adverse effects of the drugs.

resultsNinety-three percent (114/122) of the children in the chloroquine group and 94% (113/120) in the SP group completed one month follow up. SP reduced prevalence of malaria by 50% compared to chloroquine [OR = 0.50, (95% CI 0.26-0.97)]; p = 0.042. Six percent (7/122) of the children receiving weekly chloroquine had malaria related admissions compared to 2.5% (3/120) on presumptive treatment with SP. No serious drug effects were reported in both treatment groups

conclusionPresumptive treatment with SP was more efficacious than weekly chloroquine in reducing prevalence of malaria in children with sickle cell anaemia. Continued use of chloroquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis in children with sickle cell anaemia in Uganda does not seem to be justified.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellAntimalarialsChildChild, PreschoolChloroquineDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansInfantMalariaMaleParasitemiaPyrimethamineSulfadoxineTreatment OutcomeAntimalarialsChloroquineDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

PMID19852829
PMCPMC2774335
OpenAlexW2111145559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.