ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009
Construction of an annotated corpus to support biomedical information extraction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.
- A novel corpus of molecular to higher-order events that facilitates the understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A survey on clinical natural language processing in the United Kingdom from 2007 to 2022.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Review
- Semantic Representation of Context for Description of Named Rivers in a Terminological Knowledge Base.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Building a semantically annotated corpus for chronic disease complications using two document types.PloS one · 2021Article
- ProtFus: A Comprehensive Method Characterizing Protein-Protein Interactions of Fusion Proteins.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Annotating and detecting phenotypic information for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.JAMIA open · 2019Article
- Annotation and detection of drug effects in text for pharmacovigilance.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
- Exploiting and assessing multi-source data for supervised biomedical named entity recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Deep learning meets ontologies: experiments to anchor the cardiovascular disease ontology in the biomedical literature.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2018Article
- Using uncertainty to link and rank evidence from biomedical literature for model curation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Collaborative relation annotation and quality analysis in Markyt environment.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017Article
- A Review of Recent Advancement in Integrating Omics Data with Literature Mining towards Biomedical Discoveries.International journal of genomics · 2017Review
- Sortal anaphora resolution to enhance relation extraction from biomedical literature.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Text Mining the History of Medicine.PloS one · 2016Article
- Event-based text mining for biology and functional genomics.Briefings in functional genomics · 2015Review
- An Overview of Biomolecular Event Extraction from Scientific Documents.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015Review
- A resource-saving collective approach to biomedical semantic role labeling.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- NCBI disease corpus: a resource for disease name recognition and concept normalization.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2014Article
- Generalising semantic category disambiguation with large lexical resources for fun and profit.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014Article
- An analysis on the entity annotations in biological corpora.F1000Research · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformation Extraction (IE) is a component of text mining that facilitates knowledge discovery by automatically locating instances of interesting biomedical events from huge document collections. As events are usually centred on verbs and nominalised verbs, understanding the syntactic and semantic behaviour of these words is highly important. Corpora annotated with information concerning this behaviour can constitute a valuable resource in the training of IE components and resources.
resultsWe have defined a new scheme for annotating sentence-bound gene regulation events, centred on both verbs and nominalised verbs. For each event instance, all participants (arguments) in the same sentence are identified and assigned a semantic role from a rich set of 13 roles tailored to biomedical research articles, together with a biological concept type linked to the Gene Regulation Ontology. To our knowledge, our scheme is unique within the biomedical field in terms of the range of event arguments identified. Using the scheme, we have created the Gene Regulation Event Corpus (GREC), consisting of 240 MEDLINE abstracts, in which events relating to gene regulation and expression have been annotated by biologists. A novel method of evaluating various different facets of the annotation task showed that average inter-annotator agreement rates fall within the range of 66% - 90%.
conclusionThe GREC is a unique resource within the biomedical field, in that it annotates not only core relationships between entities, but also a range of other important details about these relationships, e.g., location, temporal, manner and environmental conditions. As such, it is specifically designed to support bio-specific tool and resource development. It has already been used to acquire semantic frames for inclusion within the BioLexicon (a lexical, terminological resource to aid biomedical text mining). Initial experiments have also shown that the corpus may viably be used to train IE components, such as semantic role labellers. The corpus and annotation guidelines are freely available for academic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.