Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19852524›Full record

SynthesisDrugs2009

Enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease: a systematic review of available evidence.

Roland M Schaefer, Anna Tylki-Szymańska, Max J Hilz

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nervous system and Fabry disease, from symptoms to diagnosis: damage evaluation and follow-up in adult patients, enzyme replacement, and support therapy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2010
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Renal complications of Fabry disease in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Roland M SchaeferDepartment of Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. schaefe@uni-muenster.de
Anna Tylki-Szymańska
Max J Hilz
Augenstern · DEChildren's Memorial Health Institute · PLFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fabry disease is a progressive and life-threatening glycolipid storage disorder affecting both males and females. The primary driver of the disease is the accumulation of glycolipids (globotriaosylceramide [GL-3]) in a variety of cell types, including vascular endothelial cells, a range of renal cell types, cardiomyocytes and neurons, which is caused by deficient activity of the lysosomal enzyme, alpha-galactosidase. The disease typically presents during childhood or adolescence. First manifestations reflect involvement of small nerve fibres of the peripheral and autonomic nervous systems. With age, severe complications involving the kidneys, heart and brain cause considerable morbidity and premature death. Outside the US, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with agalsidase alfa 0.2 mg/kg every other week (EOW) and agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg EOW is available for the treatment of patients with Fabry disease, while agalsidase beta 1.0 mg/kg EOW is the only approved drug in the US. To analyse the evidence for ERT, a systematic review of the literature was performed to identify prospectively designed randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label studies on the efficacy of agalsidase alfa and agalsidase beta. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched; inclusion criteria for the systematic review were prospectively designed clinical studies evaluating ERT with quantifiable endpoints: double-blind and open-label studies were eligible. Exclusion criteria were review articles, case reports, case studies, letters to the editor and articles based on registry data (Fabry Outcome Survey or Fabry Registry). In addition, any studies with a retrospective design or data based on post hoc analyses were excluded. The evidence was reviewed with respect to the clinical benefits of ERT at the level of the end organ. A total of 9 RCTs and 23 open-label studies were identified for inclusion. The efficacy of ERT in Fabry disease has been measured against a variety of endpoints, the majority of which were subclinical parameters rather than clinical outcomes. Plasma levels of GL-3 together with accumulation in the kidney, heart and skin were the most commonly studied endpoints, followed by renal endpoints of proteinuria and glomerular filtration rate, whereas cardiac and neurological endpoints were not commonly studied. To date, only one RCT with ERT defined hard clinical outcomes in the form of cardiac, renal or cerebrovascular events, or death as its primary endpoint. The currently available data from prospective RCTs and open-label studies in patients with Fabry disease are more robust for ERT at a dose of 1 mg/kg EOW than a dose of 0.2 mg/kg EOW, although the beneficial effects of ERT with either dose or preparation are variable.

Indexed as

alpha-GalactosidaseChildClinical Trials as TopicEnzyme Replacement TherapyFabry DiseaseFemaleHumansIsoenzymesMaleRecombinant ProteinsTrihexosylceramidesagalsidase alfaagalsidase betaalpha-GalactosidaseglobotriaosylceramideIsoenzymesRecombinant ProteinsTrihexosylceramides

Identifiers

PMID19852524
OpenAlexW1985776268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.