Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19851808›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgical oncology2010

Impact of selection bias on the utilization of adjuvant therapy for pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Andrew J Russ, Sharon M Weber, Robert J Rettammel, David M Mahvi, Layton F Rikkers, Clifford S Cho

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgical oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Total neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma increases probability for a complete pathologic response.European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Neoadjuvant Therapy of Pancreatic Cancer: Definitions and Benefits.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New developments in pancreatic cancer.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew J RussSection of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Sharon M Weber
Robert J Rettammel
David M Mahvi
Layton F Rikkers
Clifford S Cho
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

UW Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (UW-SORT)T32CA090217 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Muhammed Murtaza, Heather B Neuman · 2001 to 2026
$8.3M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproved outcomes have been associated with the use of adjuvant therapy after resection of pancreas adenocarcinoma. However, the frequency with which patients receive adjuvant therapy and the factors impacting its use remain largely undefined. We hypothesized that nonutilization of adjuvant therapy was primarily associated with patient comorbidity and onset of postoperative complications.

methodsA prospectively maintained database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent potentially curative resection of histologically confirmed pancreas adenocarcinoma at our institution from January 1996 to May 2007. Clinicopathological data and postoperative treatment history were collected to identify variables associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy.

resultsOf 119 patients, 33% did not receive adjuvant therapy. The frequency with which patients underwent adjuvant therapy did not change over time. On multivariate analysis, patient age 70 years or greater, major postoperative complications, distal pancreatectomy, absence of nodal metastases, and absence of perineural invasion were associated with decreased utilization of adjuvant therapy. DISCUSSION: One-third of patients in this contemporary dataset of patients did not go on to receive adjuvant therapy. The likelihood of receiving adjuvant treatment is negatively impacted by the course of postoperative recovery. Moreover, the fact that adjuvant therapy was undertaken less often for older patients and patients with favorable pathological features highlights the selection bias impacting the decision to pursue postoperative therapy for this disease. This selective utilization of postoperative therapy for patients with adverse oncological characteristics is likely to bias any retrospective analysis attempting to measure the efficacy of adjuvant treatment for pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID19851808
PMCPMC4859782
OpenAlexW2071309756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.