Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19851800›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2009

Contrast medium induced nephropathy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: differences in STEMI and NSTEMI.

Ingo Wickenbrock, Christian Perings, Petra Maagh, Ivo Quack, Marc van Bracht, Magnus W Prull, Gunnar Plehn, Hans-Joachim Trappe, Axel Meissner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ingo WickenbrockDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, St. Marien Hospital Lünen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Münster, Lünen, Germany. wickenbrock.ingo@smh-online.de
Christian Perings
Petra Maagh
Ivo Quack
Marc van Bracht
Magnus W Prull
Gunnar Plehn
Hans-Joachim Trappe
Axel Meissner
Ruhr University Bochum · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKatholisches Klinikum Lünen/Werne , St.-Marien-Hospital Lünen · DEUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinical predictors, and outcome of patients developing contrast medium induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

backgroundCIN is associated with significant higher morbidity and mortality after coronary intervention. Recently it was shown, that patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction have a significant higher risk of developing CIN. Non-ST-elevating myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients (pts) might be at an even higher risk developing CIN than patients with ST-elevating myocardial infarction (STEMI), because of presenting older and more often with diabetes.

methodsIn 392 consecutive ACS patients developing myocardial infarction and therefore undergoing emergent coronary angiography between October 2004 and March 2007, we measured serum creatinine concentration (Cr) at baseline and each day of the following 3 days. Contrast medium induced nephropathy was defined as an increase in Cr > 0.5 mg/dl. ACS was defined according to the guidelines of the German Society of Cardiology.

resultsOverall, 392 pts were included: 203 (51.8%) with STEMI and 189 (48.2%) with NSTEMI. Patients with STEMI developed more often a cardiogenic shock (18 vs. 6%; P < 0.001) whereas patients with NSTEMI were older (67 vs. 61 years; P < 0.001) and presenting with a higher co-morbidity. Forty-five (11.5%) pts developed CIN; 22 (10.8%) in the STEMI group and 23(12.2%) in the NSTEMI group (P = 0.75). Patients developing CIN presented a more complicated clinical course and a significantly longer hospital stay (14 vs. 10 days; P < 0.001). The mortality rate was also significantly higher (16 vs. 6%; P < 0.05).

conclusionThis prospective study showed no differences in the incidence of developing CIN in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI or NSTEMI, but the predisposing factors, however, differed significantly. Although STEMI patients needed significantly more contrast medium for revascularisation, they did not develop CIN more often. CIN was associated with higher in-hospital complication rate and mortality. Thus, better preventive strategies according to the different predisposing factors leading to CIN are needed to reduce morbidity and mortality, especially in high risk patients.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryContrast MediaCoronary AngiographyCreatinineGermanyHumansKidney DiseasesLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProspective StudiesContrast MediaCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID19851800
OpenAlexW2000914980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.