Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19851756›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2010

Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Toby O Smith, Farshid Ejtehadi, Rachel Nichols, Leigh Davies, Simon T Donell, Caroline B Hing

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tibial component designs in primary total knee arthroplasty: should we reconsider all-polyethylene component?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014
    Trial
  5. Gait analysis and electromyography in fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a prospective, comparative study.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2011
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Temporal patterns of commonly used clinical outcome scales during a 5-year period after total knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Mobility of the rotating platform in low contact stress knee arthroplasty is durable.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  12. No differences between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Review
  13. Mobile bearing and fixed bearing total knee arthroplasty.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Single-radius, multidirectional total knee replacement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2013
    Article
  17. Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Rotating-platform has no surface damage advantage over fixed-bearing TKA.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Toby O SmithInstitute of Orthopaedics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, Norfolk NR2 7UY, UK. toby.smith@nnuh.nhs.uk
Farshid Ejtehadi
Rachel Nichols
Leigh Davies
Simon T Donell
Caroline B Hing

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare these two TKR designs using a meta-analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED in addition to a review of unpublished material. All included papers were critically appraised using a modified PEDro critical appraisal tool. Thirty-three studies were eligible, assessing the outcomes of 3532 TKRs. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes and complication rates between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKRs.

Indexed as

Equipment Failure AnalysisProsthesis DesignArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularReoperationWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.