ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2010
Profiles of disability among adults with bipolar spectrum disorders.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a profile of activities of daily living for bipolar disorder: a systematic review protocol and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Characteristics associated with inpatient versus outpatient status in older adults with bipolar disorder.Journal of geriatric psychiatry and neurology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeterogeneous groups of patients with a spectrum of service needs are commonplace in mental health settings. Although comprehensive assessments are available to measure variations in service needs, numerous challenges still exist when confronting this heterogeneity and many assessments used in clinic settings are lengthy and have not been demonstrated to be consistent over time.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify subgroups of persons with bipolar spectrum disorders, who have similar disability profiles, and to the extent to which the subgrouping is stable over time.
methodsParticipants were recruited from the Continuous Improvement for Veterans in Care-Mood Disorders. Eligible patients (N = 435) were those who received inpatient or outpatient treatment for bipolar disorder at a large urban VA mental health facility in Western Pennsylvania from July 2004 through July 2006. This was a naturalistic cohort study of patients with bipolar spectrum disorders. Baseline and 1-year follow-up data were collected using face-to-face interviews and recorded abstraction. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Scale was the primary measure used to identify subgroups within this sample.
resultsUsing a classification strategy called latent profile analysis, this study identified three unique subgroups that showed significant differences in various clinical measures at baseline and follow-up. The largest and most consistent subgroup differences were observed in the current bipolar symptomatology.
conclusionThe classification of functional status in the present study can aid clinicians in the identification of bipolar patients, with specific impairment profiles, who may need additional intervention. Future research is needed to understand whether specific interventions targeted at these subgroups can improve the quality of care for this high-need and at-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19851701What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.