Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19850180›Full record

ReviewThe Nursing clinics of North America2009

Nursing advocacy in a postgenomic age.

Rebekah Hamilton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Nursing clinics of North America, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rebekah HamiltonDepartment of Women, Children and Family Health Science (MC 802), College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. hamilr@uic.edu

Funding

Decision Making in Young Women at Risk for HBOCR03NR009483 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HAMILTON, REBEKAH J · 2005 to 2006
$147k
NINR NIH HHS R03 NR009483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Human Genome Project will change how health is defined and how disease is prevented, diagnosed, and treated. As the largest group of health care providers in contact with patients, nurses need to be competent in the science of genetics. Beyond this, nurses need to understand the complexities that arise in genomic health care. Ethical, legal, and social issues are integral to the delivery of genomic health care, and nurses must have an astute understanding of such complexities. What it means to know, to reason, and to act in this postgenomic age is explored.

Indexed as

Nurse's RoleClinical CompetenceCodes of EthicsGenetic PrivacyGenetics, MedicalGenetic TechniquesGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Services Needs and DemandHuman Genome ProjectHumansPatient AdvocacyPatient Education as TopicPrenatal DiagnosisReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID19850180
PMCPMC2766592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.