Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19847804›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2009

Sterility testing by CE: a comparison of online preconcentration approaches in capillaries with greater internal diameters.

Jan Petr, Chunxia Jiang, Juraj Sevcik, Eva Tesarova, Daniel W Armstrong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan PetrDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019-0065, USA.
Chunxia Jiang
Juraj Sevcik
Eva Tesarova
Daniel W Armstrong

Funding

Mechanism &Use of High Efficency Microbial SeparationsR01AI056238 · NIAID · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, DANIEL W. · 2003 to 2005
$488k
NIAID NIH HHS 5 RO1AI056238-03NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of microbial contamination is of critical importance in the medical and the food industry. Rapid tests for the absence or presence of viable microorganisms are in urgent demand. CE is a modern analytical technique that can be adapted for rapid screening of microbial contamination. However, the small dimensions of capillaries allow the introduction of only a small fraction of the sample, which can be problematic when examining large samples. In this article, we examine the possibilities of introducing larger sample volumes using capillaries with greater id together with different stacking techniques. The use of 0.32 mm id capillary and the injection of 60% of the capillary volume led to approximately 120-fold improvement of the injected sample volume over the classical injection 5% of a 0.10-mm id capillary. The setup we described opens new possibilities in sterility testing using CE.

Indexed as

ElectroosmosisElectrophoresis, CapillaryHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMicrobiological TechniquesOnline SystemsSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID19847804
PMCPMC4306433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.