ArticlePloS one2009
Assessment of metabolome annotation quality: a method for evaluating the false discovery rate of elemental composition searches.
Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introducing "Identification Probability" for Automated and Transferable Assessment of Metabolite Identification Confidence in Metabolomics and Related Studies.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- In-Depth Chemical Analysis of the Brain Extracellular Space UsingAnalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Introducing 'identification probability' for automated and transferable assessment of metabolite identification confidence in metabolomics and related studies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Data Processing of Product Ion Spectra: Methods to Control False Discovery Rate in Compound Search Results for Untargeted Metabolomics.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Data Processing of Product Ion Spectra: Redundancy of Product Ion Spectra of Small Molecules in Data-Dependent Acquisition Dataset.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Approaches for assessing performance of high-resolution mass spectrometry-based non-targeted analysis methods.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Automated Recommendation of Research Keywords from PubMed That Suggest the Molecular Mechanism Associated with Biomarker Metabolites.Metabolites · 2022Article
- Data Processing of Product Ion Spectra: Quality Improvement by Averaging Multiple Similar Spectra of Small Molecules.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2022Article
- Advances in decomposing complex metabolite mixtures using substructure- and network-based computational metabolomics approaches.Natural product reports · 2021Review
- A Metabolomics Workflow for Analyzing Complex Biological Samples Using a Combined Method of Untargeted and Target-List Based Approaches.Metabolites · 2020Article
- MS-Derived Isotopic Fine Structure Reveals Forazoline A as a Thioketone-Containing Marine-Derived Natural Product.Organic letters · 2020Article
- A Perspective and Framework for Developing Sample Type Specific Databases for LC/MS-Based Clinical Metabolomics.Metabolites · 2019Article
- Target-Decoy-Based False Discovery Rate Estimation for Large-Scale Metabolite Identification.Journal of proteome research · 2018Article
- Evaluation and comparison of bioinformatic tools for the enrichment analysis of metabolomics data.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Annotation: A Computational Solution for Streamlining Metabolomics Analysis.Analytical chemistry · 2018Review
- MetaboClust: Using interactive time-series cluster analysis to relate metabolomic data with perturbed pathways.PloS one · 2018Article
- FDR-controlled metabolite annotation for high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry.Nature methods · 2017Article
- Untargeted Metabolomics Strategies-Challenges and Emerging Directions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2016Review
- The WEIZMASS spectral library for high-confidence metabolite identification.Nature communications · 2016Article
- MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Visualizing In Situ Metabolism of Endogenous Metabolites and Dietary Phytochemicals.Metabolites · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn metabolomics researches using mass spectrometry (MS), systematic searching of high-resolution mass data against compound databases is often the first step of metabolite annotation to determine elemental compositions possessing similar theoretical mass numbers. However, incorrect hits derived from errors in mass analyses will be included in the results of elemental composition searches. To assess the quality of peak annotation information, a novel methodology for false discovery rates (FDR) evaluation is presented in this study. Based on the FDR analyses, several aspects of an elemental composition search, including setting a threshold, estimating FDR, and the types of elemental composition databases most reliable for searching are discussed. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe FDR can be determined from one measured value (i.e., the hit rate for search queries) and four parameters determined by Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicate that relatively high FDR values (30-50%) were obtained when searching time-of-flight (TOF)/MS data using the KNApSAcK and KEGG databases. In addition, searches against large all-in-one databases (e.g., PubChem) always produced unacceptable results (FDR >70%). The estimated FDRs suggest that the quality of search results can be improved not only by performing more accurate mass analysis but also by modifying the properties of the compound database. A theoretical analysis indicates that FDR could be improved by using compound database with smaller but higher completeness entries. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: High accuracy mass analysis, such as Fourier transform (FT)-MS, is needed for reliable annotation (FDR <10%). In addition, a small, customized compound database is preferable for high-quality annotation of metabolome data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.