ArticleNature2009
Imaging chromophores with undetectable fluorescence by stimulated emission microscopy.
Article in Nature, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning Parameter Estimation and Quantum Control of Single Molecules.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
- Label-Free and Immobilization-Free Protein-Binding Assays by Ultraviolet Transient Absorption Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advancing Multicolor Super-Resolution Volume Imaging: Illuminating Complex Cellular Dynamics.JACS Au · 2025Review
- Quantum theory of stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.Chemical physics reviews · 2025Review
- Sensing with quantum light: a perspective.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Article
- Regarding the Nature of the Blue Pigment in Arils ofACS omega · 2025Article
- Principle of Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy: Emerging at High Spatiotemporal Limits.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Longitudinal piezoelectric resonant photoelastic modulator for efficient intensity modulation at megahertz frequencies.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Advances in nonlinear optical microscopy techniques for in vivo and in vitro neuroimaging.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Leaving the Limits of Linearity for Light Microscopy.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2020Article
- Spontaneous loss versus stimulation gain in pump-probe microscopy: a proof of concept demonstration.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
- Review
- Transient absorption microscopy: Technological innovations and applications in materials science and life science.The Journal of chemical physics · 2020Article
- Quantitative imaging of intraerythrocytic hemozoin by transient absorption microscopy.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Article
- Photolysis of Staphyloxanthin in Methicillin-ResistantAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2019Article
- Stimulated Raman Excited Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Imaging.Nature photonics · 2019Article
- Label-free quantitation of glycated hemoglobin in single red blood cells by transient absorption microscopy and phasor analysis.Science advances · 2019Article
- Correlated Materials Characterization via Multimodal Chemical and Functional Imaging.ACS nano · 2018Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence, that is, spontaneous emission, is generally more sensitive than absorption measurement, and is widely used in optical imaging. However, many chromophores, such as haemoglobin and cytochromes, absorb but have undetectable fluorescence because the spontaneous emission is dominated by their fast non-radiative decay. Yet the detection of their absorption is difficult under a microscope. Here we use stimulated emission, which competes effectively with the nonradiative decay, to make the chromophores detectable, and report a new contrast mechanism for optical microscopy. In a pump-probe experiment, on photoexcitation by a pump pulse, the sample is stimulated down to the ground state by a time-delayed probe pulse, the intensity of which is concurrently increased. We extract the miniscule intensity increase with shot-noise-limited sensitivity by using a lock-in amplifier and intensity modulation of the pump beam at a high megahertz frequency. The signal is generated only at the laser foci owing to the nonlinear dependence on the input intensities, providing intrinsic three-dimensional optical sectioning capability. In contrast, conventional one-beam absorption measurement exhibits low sensitivity, lack of three-dimensional sectioning capability, and complication by linear scattering of heterogeneous samples. We demonstrate a variety of applications of stimulated emission microscopy, such as visualizing chromoproteins, non-fluorescent variants of the green fluorescent protein, monitoring lacZ gene expression with a chromogenic reporter, mapping transdermal drug distributions without histological sectioning, and label-free microvascular imaging based on endogenous contrast of haemoglobin. For all these applications, sensitivity is orders of magnitude higher than for spontaneous emission or absorption contrast, permitting nonfluorescent reporters for molecular imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19847261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.