ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2009
Determination of Echinocandin MICs for Candida species in less than 8 hours: comparison of the rapid susceptibility assay with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute's broth microdilution assay.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The echinocandins prevent fungal cell wall synthesis by inhibiting beta-1,3-glucan synthesis, a significant glucose-consuming process. Previous studies suggested that echinocandin inhibitory activity is evident within 1 h of exposure. We hypothesized that a susceptibility assay based on glucose consumption may provide clinically useful MICs rapidly. The rapid susceptibility assay (RSA), which provides MICs in less than 8 h, was compared with the standard broth microdilution susceptibility assay (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, document M27-A3, 2008) for 56 Candida species strains. Variables which are known to influence MICs determined by the M27-A3 method were also assessed for their effects on the RSA results. Excellent agreement (>90%) between the results of the RSA and M27-A3 methods was achieved for all three FDA-approved echinocandins (micafungin, caspofungin, and anidulafungin). Candida lusitaniae strains were responsible for most of the discordant results. Assay variables such as the test medium, the age of the inoculum culture, and the presence of human serum affected MIC results from the RSA and the M27-A3 method similarly. The RSA is equivalent to the standard M27-A3 method for determining echinocandin MICs for Candida species. The RSA provides MIC results in less than 8 h and can be applied to old and young yeast colonies. The assay could potentially provide clinically useful MICs on the same day that yeast growth from a specimen is first detected on solid medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.