Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19845417›Full record

ArticleCNS drugs2009

Visual field loss in patients with refractory partial epilepsy treated with vigabatrin: final results from an open-label, observational, multicentre study.

John M Wild, Catherine Chiron, Hyosook Ahn, Michel Baulac, Joseph Bursztyn, Enrico Gandolfo, Ivan Goldberg, Francisco Javier Goñi, Florence Mercier, Jean-Philippe Nordmann and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A Mesiotemporal Lobe Epilepsy Mouse Model.Neurochemical research · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Seizure treatment in transplant patients.Current treatment options in neurology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

John M WildCardiff School of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4LU, Wales, UK. wildjm@cf.ac.uk
Catherine Chiron
Hyosook Ahn
Michel Baulac
Joseph Bursztyn
Enrico Gandolfo
Ivan Goldberg
Francisco Javier Goñi
Florence Mercier
Jean-Philippe Nordmann
Avinoam B Safran
Ulrich Schiefer
Emilio Perucca
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · ITCardiff University · GBCentre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHôpital Saint-Vincent-de-Paul · FRSorbonne Université · FRSTZ eyetrial · DESydney Hospital · AUUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Ulsan · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin is associated with an elevated risk of visual field loss.

objectiveTo determine the frequency of, and risk factors for, vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in the setting of a large-scale, multinational, prospective, observational study. STUDY

designA comparative, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study.

settingHospital outpatient clinics at 46 centres in five countries. PATIENTS: 734 patients with refractory partial epilepsy, divided into three groups and stratified by age (8-12 years; >12 years) and exposure to vigabatrin. Group I comprised patients treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months. Group II comprised patients previously treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months who had withdrawn from the drug for > or =6 months. Group III comprised patients never treated with vigabatrin. Patients underwent perimetry at either 4- or 6-month intervals, for up to 36 months. Visual field outcome was evaluated masked to drug exposure.

interventionPerimetry.

main outcome measureThe visual field outcome at each of four analysis points: (i) at enrolment (i.e. baseline, all patients); (ii) for patients exhibiting a conclusive outcome at the initial visual field examination; (iii) for patients exhibiting at least one conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations; and (iv) at the last conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations.

resultsOf the 734 patients, 524 yielded one or more conclusive visual field examinations. For Group I, the frequency of VAVFL at the last conclusive examination was 10/38 (26.3%) for those aged 8-12 years and 65/150 (43.3%) for those aged >12 years. For Group II, the respective frequencies were 7/47 (14.9%) and 37/151 (24.5%). One case resembling VAVFL was present amongst the 186 patients in Group III at the last conclusive examination. The frequency of VAVFL in Groups I and II combined was 20.0% for those aged 8-12 years and 33.9% for those aged >12 years. VAVFL was associated with duration of vigabatrin therapy (odds ratio [OR] up to 15.2; 95% CI 4.4, 51.7), mean daily dose of vigabatrin (OR up to 26.4; 95% CI 2.4, 291.7) and male gender (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.5, 4.1). VAVFL was more frequently detected with static than with kinetic perimetry (OR up to 0.43; 95% CI 0.24, 0.75).

conclusionsSince the probability of VAVFL is positively associated with treatment duration, careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of continuing treatment with vigabatrin is recommended in patients currently receiving this drug. All patients continuing to receive vigabatrin should undergo visual field examination at least every 6 months for the duration of treatment. We recommend two-level (three-zone), gradient-adapted, suprathreshold static perimetry of the peripheral field together with threshold perimetry of the central field out to 30 degrees from fixation. The frequency of ophthalmological and perimetric examinations should be increased in the presence of VAVFL.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsAnticonvulsantsChildDrug MonitoringEpilepsies, PartialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsAnticonvulsantsVigabatrin

Identifiers

PMID19845417
OpenAlexW1607402462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.