ArticleCNS drugs2009
Visual field loss in patients with refractory partial epilepsy treated with vigabatrin: final results from an open-label, observational, multicentre study.
Article in CNS drugs, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Identification of New Antiseizure Medication Candidates in Preclinical Animal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Evaluation of ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in epilepsy patients.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Astrocytes: Role in pathogenesis and effect of commonly misused drugs in the HIV infected brain.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Update on Drug Management of Refractory Epilepsy in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.Paediatric drugs · 2020Review
- Objective Derivation of the Morphology and Staging of Visual Field Loss Associated with Long-Term Vigabatrin Therapy.CNS drugs · 2019Observational
- Observational
- Synthesis of ( S)-3-Amino-4-(difluoromethylenyl)-cyclopent-1-ene-1-carboxylic Acid (OV329), a Potent Inactivator of γ-Aminobutyric Acid Aminotransferase.Organic letters · 2018Article
- Design and Mechanism of GABA Aminotransferase Inactivators. Treatments for Epilepsies and Addictions.Chemical reviews · 2018Review
- Design and Mechanism of (S)-3-Amino-4-(difluoromethylenyl)cyclopent-1-ene-1-carboxylic Acid, a Highly Potent γ-Aminobutyric Acid Aminotransferase Inactivator for the Treatment of Addiction.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018Article
- A Mesiotemporal Lobe Epilepsy Mouse Model.Neurochemical research · 2017Review
- Mechanism of Inactivation of GABA Aminotransferase by (E)- and (Z)-(1S,3S)-3-Amino-4-fluoromethylenyl-1-cyclopentanoic Acid.ACS chemical biology · 2015Article
- Design and mechanism of tetrahydrothiophene-based γ-aminobutyric acid aminotransferase inactivators.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015Article
- Does the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) accurately map visual field loss attributed to vigabatrin?BMC ophthalmology · 2014Article
- CPP-115, a vigabatrin analogue, decreases spasms in the multiple-hit rat model of infantile spasms.Epilepsia · 2014Article
- Modelling the risk of visual field loss arising from long-term exposure to the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin: a cross-sectional approach.CNS drugs · 2013Article
- Treatment of epileptic encephalopathies.CNS drugs · 2013Review
- Clinical management of seizures in newborns : diagnosis and treatment.Paediatric drugs · 2013Review
- Seizure treatment in transplant patients.Current treatment options in neurology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUse of the antiepileptic drug vigabatrin is associated with an elevated risk of visual field loss.
objectiveTo determine the frequency of, and risk factors for, vigabatrin-attributed visual field loss (VAVFL) in the setting of a large-scale, multinational, prospective, observational study. STUDY
designA comparative, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study.
settingHospital outpatient clinics at 46 centres in five countries. PATIENTS: 734 patients with refractory partial epilepsy, divided into three groups and stratified by age (8-12 years; >12 years) and exposure to vigabatrin. Group I comprised patients treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months. Group II comprised patients previously treated with vigabatrin for > or =6 months who had withdrawn from the drug for > or =6 months. Group III comprised patients never treated with vigabatrin. Patients underwent perimetry at either 4- or 6-month intervals, for up to 36 months. Visual field outcome was evaluated masked to drug exposure.
interventionPerimetry.
main outcome measureThe visual field outcome at each of four analysis points: (i) at enrolment (i.e. baseline, all patients); (ii) for patients exhibiting a conclusive outcome at the initial visual field examination; (iii) for patients exhibiting at least one conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations; and (iv) at the last conclusive outcome to the visual field examinations.
resultsOf the 734 patients, 524 yielded one or more conclusive visual field examinations. For Group I, the frequency of VAVFL at the last conclusive examination was 10/38 (26.3%) for those aged 8-12 years and 65/150 (43.3%) for those aged >12 years. For Group II, the respective frequencies were 7/47 (14.9%) and 37/151 (24.5%). One case resembling VAVFL was present amongst the 186 patients in Group III at the last conclusive examination. The frequency of VAVFL in Groups I and II combined was 20.0% for those aged 8-12 years and 33.9% for those aged >12 years. VAVFL was associated with duration of vigabatrin therapy (odds ratio [OR] up to 15.2; 95% CI 4.4, 51.7), mean daily dose of vigabatrin (OR up to 26.4; 95% CI 2.4, 291.7) and male gender (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.5, 4.1). VAVFL was more frequently detected with static than with kinetic perimetry (OR up to 0.43; 95% CI 0.24, 0.75).
conclusionsSince the probability of VAVFL is positively associated with treatment duration, careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of continuing treatment with vigabatrin is recommended in patients currently receiving this drug. All patients continuing to receive vigabatrin should undergo visual field examination at least every 6 months for the duration of treatment. We recommend two-level (three-zone), gradient-adapted, suprathreshold static perimetry of the peripheral field together with threshold perimetry of the central field out to 30 degrees from fixation. The frequency of ophthalmological and perimetric examinations should be increased in the presence of VAVFL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.