ArticleInflammation2010
Beneficial effects of TLR-2/6 ligation in pulmonary bacterial infection and immunization with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Article in Inflammation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pushing the envelope: Immune mechanism and application landscape of macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Article
- InactivatedExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Tacrolimus downregulates inflammation by regulating pro‑/anti‑inflammatory responses in LPS‑induced keratitis.Molecular medicine reports · 2017Article
- Pulmonary immunostimulation with MALP-2 in influenza virus-infected mice increases survival after pneumococcal superinfection.Infection and immunity · 2015Article
- A purified recombinant lipopeptide as adjuvant for cancer immunotherapy.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- MALP-2 pre-treatment modulates systemic inflammation in hemorrhagic shock.Journal of inflammation (London, England) · 2013Article
- Regulation on expression of toll-like receptors on monocytes after stimulation with the 3-o-C12-HSL molecule from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Current microbiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is the major pathogen in nosocomial and life-threatening infections of immunocompromised or critically ill patients. The macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2 (MALP-2) activates the immune system via Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 6 and leads to an accumulation of immune cells in lungs of young adult (8-10 week old) rats after intratracheal application. This is characterized by a high increase of granulocyte numbers in the BAL 24 h after MALP-2 treatment. It was hypothesized that MALP-2 may have a positive effect on the clinical course of an experimental infection. Therefore, rats were treated with MALP-2 at different time points following an infection with P. aeruginosa. The effect of MALP-2 in combination with immunization with inactivated P. aeruginosa was also investigated. Rats (n = 10) were infected intratracheally (i.t.) with 1 x 10(8) CFU P. aeruginosa on day 0. They were treated on day -3, -1, 0 and +1 with 2.5 microg MALP-2 or the vehicle i.t. In additional experiments, rats were immunized on day -21 and -14 with 1 x 10(8) CFU of inactivated P. aeruginosa bacteria and 2.5 microg MALP-2 or vehicle with 1 x 10(8) CFU of inactivated bacteria and isopropanol. The clinical score, rectal temperature and weight of the rats were checked in both treatment and immunization experiments twice a day. On day 2 they were sacrificed, CFU were determined in the left lung, the right lung being used for histology. In the group treated with MALP-2 1 day prior to infection significant effects were seen: The rectal temperature was about 2 degrees C higher in comparison to the controls at 6 h and also 1 day after infection. Both the symptoms of the infection and the weight loss were significantly reduced. In addition, the CFU and the inflammation in the lung tissue were significantly lower. These effects were not observed after treatment on day -3, 0 or +1. The MALP-2 enhanced immunization only resulted in a tendency to clinical improvement. In conclusion, local immunostimulation at the appropriate time can enhance the host defense against bacteria in the lung.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.