Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19844594›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports

Salivary protein factors are elevated in breast cancer patients.

Mai N Brooks, Jianghua Wang, Yang Li, Rong Zhang, David Elashoff, David T Wong

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Saliva Diagnostics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Salivary biomarkers in breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  13. Proteomics and its applications in breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mai N BrooksUCLA School of Medicine, Division of Surgical Oncology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jianghua Wang
Yang Li
Rong Zhang
David Elashoff
David T Wong
University of Dental Medicine · MMFaculty of Public Health · GBUCLA Health · US

Funding

Human Salivary ProteomeU01DE016275 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, DAVID T · 2004 to 2007
$5.5M
Genomics and Proteomics of Oral Precancer ProgressionR01DE015970 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, DAVID T · 2004 to 2009
$1.9M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015970NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While saliva is a source of easily accessible bodily fluids, there has been little effort to study its value in cancer diagnosis. We hypothesized that certain proteins would be elevated in the saliva of patients with breast cancer. Our study included 49 healthy individuals and 49 breast cancer patients. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the saliva were measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We observed that salivary fluid protein levels were significantly elevated in cancer patients as follows: i) VEGF, 3.7±1.6 in cancer versus 2.1±1.2 ng/ml in control (p<0.0001); ii) EGF, 3.7±1.7 versus 2.1±1.3 ng/ml (p<0.0001); and iii) CEA, 83±31 versus 66.1±27.1 ng/ml (p=0.0106). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) were 80, 77 and 65%, respectively. The best prediction was from the combination of salivary VEGF and EGF with a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 74% and AUC of 84%. We conclude that saliva is a novel avenue for tumor marker research and deserves further studies. Saliva may potentially be useful in supplementing current methods of breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

breast cancercarcinoembryonic antigenepidermal growth factorsalivatumor markervascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID19844594
PMCPMC2763326
OpenAlexW1970392917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.