Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19843686›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2009

Breast cancer recurrence in older women five to ten years after diagnosis.

Jaclyn L F Bosco, Timothy L Lash, Marianne N Prout, Diana S M Buist, Ann M Geiger, Reina Haque, Feifei Wei, Rebecca A Silliman, BOW Investigators

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stanniocalcin Expression as a Predictor of Late Breast Cancer Recurrence.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2018
    Article
  12. The Augusta, Georgia Breast Cancer Survivor Study.Journal of cancer treatment & diagnosis · 2018
    Article
  13. Contralateral Breast Cancer Event Detection Using Nature Language Processing.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The differences of clinicopathological factors for breast cancer in respect to time of recurrence and effect on recurrence-free survival.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jaclyn L F BoscoDepartment of Medicine, Section of Geriatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USA.
Timothy L Lash
Marianne N Prout
Diana S M Buist
Ann M Geiger
Reina Haque
Feifei Wei
Rebecca A Silliman
BOW Investigators
Group Health Cooperative · USHealthPartners · USWake Forest University · USBoston University · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

Long-term Survivorship in Older Women with Early Stage Breast CancerR01CA093772 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SILLIMAN, REBECCA A · 2003 to 2011
$7.5M
Cancer Control in Older AdultsK05CA092395 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI SILLIMAN, REBECCA A · 2001 to 2010
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA092395NCI NIH HHS R01 CA 093772NCI NIH HHS R01 CA093772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the risk of recurrence >5 years after diagnosis among older breast cancer survivors. A community-based population of women >or=65 years diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who survived disease free for 5 years was followed for 5 additional years or until a diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence, second primary, death, or loss to follow-up. These 5-year disease-free survivors (N = 1,277) had primary breast cancers that were node negative (77%) and estrogen receptor positive or unknown (86%). Five percent (n = 61) developed a recurrence between 5 and 10 years after diagnosis: 25% local, 9.8% regional, and 66% distant. Women who were node positive [hazard ratio (HR), 3.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.5-10], had poorly differentiated tumors (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.9-6.6), or who received breast conserving surgery without radiation therapy (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.8) had higher recurrence rates compared with node negative, well differentiated, and receipt of mastectomy, respectively. Not receiving adjuvant tamoxifen, compared with receiving adjuvant tamoxifen, was also positively associated with late recurrence among women with estrogen receptor-positive/unknown tumors. Although relatively few women experience a late recurrence, most recurrences present as advanced disease, which is difficult to treat in older women. This study of late recurrence emphasizes that the risk, although small, is not negligible even in this group at high risk of death due to competing causes.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSurvival RateTamoxifenTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID19843686
PMCPMC2784208
OpenAlexW2154226022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.