ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2009
Using patient experience within pay for performance programmes.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the hospital or immunizing its organization? Patient and public involvement at the service of quality.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Article
- Differential item functioning of the CAHPS® In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Level of satisfaction of older persons with their general practitioner and practice: role of complexity of health problems.PloS one · 2014Article
- Identifying factors associated with experiences of coronary heart disease patients receiving structured chronic care and counselling in European primary care.BMC health services research · 2012Article
- Experiencing patient-experience surveys: a qualitative study of the accounts of GPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
- Patients' experience and satisfaction in primary care: secondary analysis using multilevel modelling.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19843567What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.