ArticleBiophysical journal2009
Quantitative comparison of different fluorescent protein couples for fast FRET-FLIM acquisition.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.
- FtsW protein-protein interactions visualized in live Staphylococcus aureus cells by FLIM-FRET.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Development of capsaicin-derived prohibitin ligands to modulate the Aurora kinase A/PHB2 interaction and mitophagy in cancer cells.Communications biology · 2026Article
- FRETsael: Nanometer localization of biomolecular interactions using fluorescence lifetime imaging.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Implementation of FRET Spectrometry Using Temporally Resolved Fluorescence: A Feasibility Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Actin cytoskeleton differently regulates cell surface organization of GPI-anchored proteins in polarized epithelial cells and fibroblasts.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Multicolor lifetime imaging and its application to HIV-1 uptake.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Simple phasor-based deep neural network for fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A Combined Acceptor Photobleaching and Donor Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy Approach to Analyze Multi-Protein Interactions in Living Cells.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Structural basis of semaphorin-plexin cis interaction.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: fundamentals and advances in instrumentation, analysis, and applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Review
- Article
- Comparing the performance of mScarlet-I, mRuby3, and mCherry as FRET acceptors for mNeonGreen.PloS one · 2020Article
- Fluorescence lifetime imaging nanoscopy for measuring Förster resonance energy transfer in cellular nanodomains.Neurophotonics · 2019Article
- Nanoscale gizmos - the novel fluorescent probes for monitoring protein activity.Biochemical engineering journal · 2018Review
- GPI-anchored proteins are confined in subdiffraction clusters at the apical surface of polarized epithelial cells.The Biochemical journal · 2017Article
- A new mechanism of voltage-dependent gating exposed by KThe Journal of general physiology · 2017Article
- Multiplexing PKA and ERK1&2 kinases FRET biosensors in living cells using single excitation wavelength dual colour FLIM.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Dynamin-2 Stabilizes the HIV-1 Fusion Pore with a Low Oligomeric State.Cell reports · 2017Article
- A FRET biosensor reveals spatiotemporal activation and functions of aurora kinase A in living cells.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Imaging real-time HIV-1 virion fusion with FRET-based biosensors.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fluorescent-protein based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) approach is a powerful method for quantifying protein-protein interactions in living cells, especially when combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). To compare the performance of different FRET couples for FRET-FLIM experiments, we first tested enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) linked to different red acceptors (mRFP1-EGFP, mStrawberry-EGFP, HaloTag (TMR)-EGFP, and mCherry-EGFP). We obtained a fraction of donor engaged in FRET (f(D)) that was far from the ideal case of one, using different mathematical models assuming a double species model (i.e., discrete double exponential fixing the donor lifetime and double exponential stretched for the FRET lifetime). We show that the relatively low f(D) percentages obtained with these models may be due to spectroscopic heterogeneity of the acceptor population, which is partially caused by different maturation rates for the donor and the acceptor. In an attempt to improve the amount of donor protein engaged in FRET, we tested mTFP1 as a donor coupled to mOrange and EYFP, respectively. mTFP1 turned out to be at least as good as EGFP for donor FRET-FLIM experiments because 1), its lifetime remained constant during light-induced fluorescent changes; 2), its fluorescence decay profile was best fitted with a single exponential model; and 3), no photoconversion was detected. The f(D) value when combined with EYFP as an acceptor was the highest of all tandems tested (0.7). Moreover, in the context of fast acquisitions, we obtained a minimal f(D) (mf(D)) for mTFP1-EYFP that was almost two times greater than that for mCherry-EGFP (0.65 vs. 0.35). Finally, we compared EGFP and mTFP1 in a biological situation in which the fusion proteins were highly immobile, and EGFP and mTFP1 were linked to the histone H4 (EGFP-H4 and mTFP1-H4) in fast FLIM acquisitions. In this particular case, the fluorescence intensity was more stable for EGFP-H4 than for mTFP1-H4. Nevertheless, we show that mTFP1/EYFP stands alone as the best FRET-FLIM couple in terms of f(D) analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.