Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19843422›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2009

Predictors of patient-initiated reconsultation for lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.

Jochen W L Cals, Kerenza Hood, Nienke Aaftink, Rogier M Hopstaken, Nick A Francis, Geert-Jan Dinant, Christopher C Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Primary care consultations after hospitalisation for pneumonia: a large population-based cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  9. Reducing uncertainty in managing respiratory tract infections in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Article
  10. The antibiotic revolution should be more focused.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jochen W L CalsDepartment of General Practice, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. j.cals@hag.unimaas.nl
Kerenza Hood
Nienke Aaftink
Rogier M Hopstaken
Nick A Francis
Geert-Jan Dinant
Christopher C Butler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reconsultation for lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is common in general practice, but those who reconsult rarely have more significant illness warranting antibiotics. Knowledge of factors that predict patient-initiated reconsultation may allow clinicians to address specific issues during the initial consultation that could reduce reconsultations. Thirty-three per cent of a cohort of 431 LRTI patients in a randomised controlled trial reconsulted. Excluding 35 patients with GP-requested reconsultation left 28% (112/396) with a patient-initiated reconsultation during 28-day follow-up. Patient-reported dyspnoea and concerns that persisted after the initial consultation independently predicted patient-initiated reconsultation.

Indexed as

Family PracticePatient Acceptance of Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPoint-of-Care SystemsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID19843422
PMCPMC2751918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.