Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19843300›Full record

ArticleVeterinary clinical pathology2010

Pseudomonas fluorescens contamination of a feline packed red blood cell unit and studies of canine units.

Rebecca J Kessler, Shelley Rankin, Sheri Young, Kathleen O'Shea, Maria Calabrese, Amy Guldin, Nicole Lipson, Donna A Oakley, Urs Giger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary clinical pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca J KesslerDepartment of Clinical Studies, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shelley Rankin
Sheri Young
Kathleen O'Shea
Maria Calabrese
Amy Guldin
Nicole Lipson
Donna A Oakley
Urs Giger
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Referral Ctr-Animal models of human genetic diseaseP40OD010939 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CASAL, MARGRET L · 2012 to 2023
$7.9M
X-LINKED SEVERE COMBINED IMMUNODEFICIENCY IN THE DOGP40RR002512 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HASKINS, MARK E · 1985 to 2011
$7.6M
NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR002512NIH HHS P40 OD010939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile screening programs have reduced the risk of infectious disease transmission by donors in human and veterinary blood banking, bacterial contamination of blood products has emerged as a major complication in human medicine.

objectivesTo describe a Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf)-contaminated feline packed RBC (pRBC) unit and experimentally investigate Pf-contaminated canine pRBCs.

methodsCanine pRBCs were inoculated with Pf-rich pRBCs from the sentinel feline unit and stored at 4 degrees C or 20 degrees C for 72 hours. Aliquots from the pRBCs were serially evaluated by microscopy, culture, and a eubacterial 16S rRNA real-time PCR assay.

resultsOne Pf-contaminated feline unit turned black after 22 days of storage and was removed from the blood bank; a source was not found, and no other contaminated units were identified. Canine pRBCs spiked with 5 or 25 microL of the sentinel unit became culture- and/or 16S PCR-positive at > or =8 hours at 20 degrees C and 48 hours at 4 degrees C and developed a color change at > or =24 hours. Sensitivity studies indicated that without incubation, inoculation of > or =100 microL Pf-rich pRBCs was necessary for a positive 16S PCR test result.

conclusionsP. fluorescens grows in stored pRBCs slowly at 4 degrees C and rapidly at 20 degrees C. Screening of blood products for color change, estimating bacterial concentration with microscopy, and 16S PCR testing are simple and fast ways to detect bacteria in stored blood. Aseptic collection, temperature-controlled storage, and regular visual monitoring of stored units is recommended. Discolored units should not be transfused, but examined for bacterial contamination or other blood product quality problems.

Indexed as

AnimalsBloodBlood BanksBlood DonorsBlood PreservationCatsDogsMalePolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonas fluorescensRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSpecimen HandlingRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID19843300
PMCPMC3111970
OpenAlexW2066739061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.