ArticleVeterinary clinical pathology2010
Pseudomonas fluorescens contamination of a feline packed red blood cell unit and studies of canine units.
Article in Veterinary clinical pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid colorimetric antimicrobial susceptibilities direct from positive blood culture for Gram-negative bacteria.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Comparison of a closed system and an open system for blood collection in feline donors.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2016Article
- Xenotransfusion of anemic cats with blood compatibility issues: pre- and posttransfusion laboratory diagnostic and crossmatching studies.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2016Article
- In vitro lysis and acute transfusion reactions with hemolysis caused by inappropriate storage of canine red blood cell products.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile screening programs have reduced the risk of infectious disease transmission by donors in human and veterinary blood banking, bacterial contamination of blood products has emerged as a major complication in human medicine.
objectivesTo describe a Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf)-contaminated feline packed RBC (pRBC) unit and experimentally investigate Pf-contaminated canine pRBCs.
methodsCanine pRBCs were inoculated with Pf-rich pRBCs from the sentinel feline unit and stored at 4 degrees C or 20 degrees C for 72 hours. Aliquots from the pRBCs were serially evaluated by microscopy, culture, and a eubacterial 16S rRNA real-time PCR assay.
resultsOne Pf-contaminated feline unit turned black after 22 days of storage and was removed from the blood bank; a source was not found, and no other contaminated units were identified. Canine pRBCs spiked with 5 or 25 microL of the sentinel unit became culture- and/or 16S PCR-positive at > or =8 hours at 20 degrees C and 48 hours at 4 degrees C and developed a color change at > or =24 hours. Sensitivity studies indicated that without incubation, inoculation of > or =100 microL Pf-rich pRBCs was necessary for a positive 16S PCR test result.
conclusionsP. fluorescens grows in stored pRBCs slowly at 4 degrees C and rapidly at 20 degrees C. Screening of blood products for color change, estimating bacterial concentration with microscopy, and 16S PCR testing are simple and fast ways to detect bacteria in stored blood. Aseptic collection, temperature-controlled storage, and regular visual monitoring of stored units is recommended. Discolored units should not be transfused, but examined for bacterial contamination or other blood product quality problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.