Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19841865›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2010

Prognostic value of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioblastoma patients, assessed by five different methods.

Lucie Karayan-Tapon, Véronique Quillien, Joëlle Guilhot, Michel Wager, Gaëlle Fromont, Stephan Saikali, Amandine Etcheverry, Abderrahmane Hamlat, Delphine Loussouarn, Loïc Campion and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Physiologic MR imaging of the tumor microenvironment revealed switching of metabolic phenotype upon recurrence of glioblastoma in humans.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Cancer genomics & proteomics
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prognosis ofSouth Asian journal of cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Association betweenCells · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Prospective Evaluation ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie Karayan-TaponUniversité de Poitiers, 86021 Poitiers, France.
Véronique Quillien
Joëlle Guilhot
Michel Wager
Gaëlle Fromont
Stephan Saikali
Amandine Etcheverry
Abderrahmane Hamlat
Delphine Loussouarn
Loïc Campion
Mario Campone
François-Marie Vallette
Catherine Gratas-Rabbia-Ré
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRNantes Université · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRClinical Investigation Center Plurithematic Tours · FRGenopole (France) · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Rennes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter study assesses the value of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status for predicting overall survival in glioblastoma patients. Five methods are used, to identify the approach with the best prognostic value. Eighty-one tumors were obtained from patients with glioblastomas treated by surgery and radiotherapy with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by qualitative methyl-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), semiquantitative methyl-specific polymerase chain reaction (SQ-MSP), and pyrosequencing, while MGMT expression was measured at the RNA level by quantitative real-time PCR (Q-RT-PCR) and at the protein level by immunohistochemistry (IHC). MGMT promoter methylation as evaluated by MSP, SQ-MSP, and pyrosequencing was significantly correlated with overall survival. The best predictive value was obtained by pyrosequencing of one specific CpG position. Overall survival was 14 and 25 months for patients with percentages of methylation below and above the median, respectively. In contrast, MGMT status determined by Q-RT-PCR and IHC showed little or no correlation with overall survival, respectively. These results confirm the prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients initially treated with TMZ. SQ-MSP allowed better discrimination than classical MSP, and pyrosequencing represented a good option.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProbabilityPrognosisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionStatistics, NonparametricDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19841865
OpenAlexW2074095225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.