ArticlePLoS biology2009
Daughter-specific transcription factors regulate cell size control in budding yeast.
Article in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell cycle-dependent protein dynamics in budding yeast resolved by deconvolution of bulk proteomics.Molecular systems biology · 2026Article
- Cell division timing shapes the morphology and size of nascent multicellular organisms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Fkh1/2 binding site array in the WHI5 promoter drives sub-scaling transcription.Cell reports · 2026Article
- A Fkh1/2 binding site array in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The "weaken-fill-repair" model for cell budding: Linking cell wall biosynthesis with mechanics.iScience · 2024Article
- Whi5 hypo- and hyper-phosphorylation dynamics control cell-cycle entry and progression.Current biology : CB · 2024Article
- Unicellular life balances asymmetric allocation and repair of somatic damage representing the origin of r/K selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Ubiquitin proteolysis of a CDK-related kinase regulates titan cell formation and virulence in the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Nuclear pore complex acetylation regulates mRNA export and cell cycle commitment in budding yeast.The EMBO journal · 2022Article
- Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates a fitness valley crossing in experimentally evolved multicellular yeast.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Mad3 modulates the GScience advances · 2022Article
- Drug-dependent growth curve reshaping reveals mechanisms of antifungal resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Accumulation of cis- and trans-regulatory variations is associated with phenotypic divergence of a complex trait between yeast species.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Scaling gene expression for cell size control and senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Current genetics · 2021Review
- The mitotic exit network regulates the spatiotemporal activity of Cdc42 to maintain cell size.The Journal of cell biology · 2021Article
- Ash1 and Tup1 dependent repression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter requires activator-dependent nucleosome eviction.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- Differential Scaling of Gene Expression with Cell Size May Explain Size Control in Budding Yeast.Molecular cell · 2020Article
- A hybrid stochastic model of the budding yeast cell cycle.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020Article
- Multiple Negative Regulators Restrict Recruitment of the SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeler to theGenetics · 2019Article
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In budding yeast, asymmetric cell division yields a larger mother and a smaller daughter cell, which transcribe different genes due to the daughter-specific transcription factors Ace2 and Ash1. Cell size control at the Start checkpoint has long been considered to be a main regulator of the length of the G1 phase of the cell cycle, resulting in longer G1 in the smaller daughter cells. Our recent data confirmed this concept using quantitative time-lapse microscopy. However, it has been proposed that daughter-specific, Ace2-dependent repression of expression of the G1 cyclin CLN3 had a dominant role in delaying daughters in G1. We wanted to reconcile these two divergent perspectives on the origin of long daughter G1 times. We quantified size control using single-cell time-lapse imaging of fluorescently labeled budding yeast, in the presence or absence of the daughter-specific transcriptional regulators Ace2 and Ash1. Ace2 and Ash1 are not required for efficient size control, but they shift the domain of efficient size control to larger cell size, thus increasing cell size requirement for Start in daughters. Microarray and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Ace2 and Ash1 are direct transcriptional regulators of the G1 cyclin gene CLN3. Quantification of cell size control in cells expressing titrated levels of Cln3 from ectopic promoters, and from cells with mutated Ace2 and Ash1 sites in the CLN3 promoter, showed that regulation of CLN3 expression by Ace2 and Ash1 can account for the differential regulation of Start in response to cell size in mothers and daughters. We show how daughter-specific transcriptional programs can interact with intrinsic cell size control to differentially regulate Start in mother and daughter cells. This work demonstrates mechanistically how asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants results in cell-type-specific regulation of the cell cycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.