Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19841732›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2009

Daughter-specific transcription factors regulate cell size control in budding yeast.

Stefano Di Talia, Hongyin Wang, Jan M Skotheim, Adam P Rosebrock, Bruce Futcher, Frederick R Cross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Fkh1/2 binding site array in thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mad3 modulates the GScience advances · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A hybrid stochastic model of the budding yeast cell cycle.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano Di TaliaThe Rockefeller University, New York, New York, USA.
Hongyin Wang
Jan M Skotheim
Adam P Rosebrock
Bruce Futcher
Frederick R Cross
Rockefeller University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

SIZE CONTROL &COMMITMENT TO DIVISION IN S. CEREVISIAER01GM039978 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FUTCHER, BRUCE BRUCE · 1988 to 2014
$4.3M
SPECIFICITY OF CYCLIN FUNCTION AT CELL CYCLE INITIATIONR01GM047238 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 1993 to 2010
$3.4M
Sources and Consequences of noise in cell cycle regulationR01GM078153 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI CROSS, FREDERICK R. · 2006 to 2019
$3.3M
Analysis of the Yeast Cell Cycle Transcriptional ProgramR01GM064813 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI FUTCHER, BRUCE BRUCE · 2001 to 2008
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM47238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039978NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM047238NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064813NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078153NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM78153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In budding yeast, asymmetric cell division yields a larger mother and a smaller daughter cell, which transcribe different genes due to the daughter-specific transcription factors Ace2 and Ash1. Cell size control at the Start checkpoint has long been considered to be a main regulator of the length of the G1 phase of the cell cycle, resulting in longer G1 in the smaller daughter cells. Our recent data confirmed this concept using quantitative time-lapse microscopy. However, it has been proposed that daughter-specific, Ace2-dependent repression of expression of the G1 cyclin CLN3 had a dominant role in delaying daughters in G1. We wanted to reconcile these two divergent perspectives on the origin of long daughter G1 times. We quantified size control using single-cell time-lapse imaging of fluorescently labeled budding yeast, in the presence or absence of the daughter-specific transcriptional regulators Ace2 and Ash1. Ace2 and Ash1 are not required for efficient size control, but they shift the domain of efficient size control to larger cell size, thus increasing cell size requirement for Start in daughters. Microarray and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments show that Ace2 and Ash1 are direct transcriptional regulators of the G1 cyclin gene CLN3. Quantification of cell size control in cells expressing titrated levels of Cln3 from ectopic promoters, and from cells with mutated Ace2 and Ash1 sites in the CLN3 promoter, showed that regulation of CLN3 expression by Ace2 and Ash1 can account for the differential regulation of Start in response to cell size in mothers and daughters. We show how daughter-specific transcriptional programs can interact with intrinsic cell size control to differentially regulate Start in mother and daughter cells. This work demonstrates mechanistically how asymmetric localization of cell fate determinants results in cell-type-specific regulation of the cell cycle.

Indexed as

CyclinsDNA-Binding ProteinsG1 PhaseGene Expression Regulation, FungalRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsCell CycleCell DivisionPromoter Regions, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTime FactorsACE2 protein, S cerevisiaeASH1 protein, S cerevisiaeCLN3 protein, S cerevisiaeCyclinsDNA-Binding ProteinsRepressor ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19841732
PMCPMC2756959
OpenAlexW2029804925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.