Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19841728›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2009

Differentiation driven changes in the dynamic organization of Basal transcription initiation.

Giuseppina Giglia-Mari, Arjan F Theil, Pierre-Olivier Mari, Sophie Mourgues, Julie Nonnekens, Lise O Andrieux, Jan de Wit, Catherine Miquel, Nils Wijgers, Alex Maas and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanistic insights in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair of ribosomal DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. ELL, a novel TFIIH partner, is involved in transcription restart after DNA repair.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Giuseppina Giglia-MariDepartment of Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. ambra.mari@ipbs.fr
Arjan F Theil
Pierre-Olivier Mari
Sophie Mourgues
Julie Nonnekens
Lise O Andrieux
Jan de Wit
Catherine Miquel
Nils Wijgers
Alex Maas
Maria Fousteri
Jan H J Hoeijmakers
Wim Vermeulen
Erasmus MC · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

European Research Council 233424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies based on cell-free systems and on in vitro-cultured living cells support the concept that many cellular processes, such as transcription initiation, are highly dynamic: individual proteins stochastically bind to their substrates and disassemble after reaction completion. This dynamic nature allows quick adaptation of transcription to changing conditions. However, it is unknown to what extent this dynamic transcription organization holds for postmitotic cells embedded in mammalian tissue. To allow analysis of transcription initiation dynamics directly into living mammalian tissues, we created a knock-in mouse model expressing fluorescently tagged TFIIH. Surprisingly and in contrast to what has been observed in cultured and proliferating cells, postmitotic murine cells embedded in their tissue exhibit a strong and long-lasting transcription-dependent immobilization of TFIIH. This immobilization is both differentiation driven and development dependent. Furthermore, although very statically bound, TFIIH can be remobilized to respond to new transcriptional needs. This divergent spatiotemporal transcriptional organization in different cells of the soma revisits the generally accepted highly dynamic concept of the kinetic framework of transcription and shows how basic processes, such as transcription, can be organized in a fundamentally different fashion in intact organisms as previously deduced from in vitro studies.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalTranscription, GeneticAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCells, CulturedCerebellumCerebral CortexChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEmbryonic Stem CellsFibroblastsFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingKineticsLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLBacterial ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTranscription Factor TFIIHyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID19841728
PMCPMC2754661
OpenAlexW2024280286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.