Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19840551›Full record

ReviewNeuron2009

Immune influence on adult neural stem cell regulation and function.

Pamela A Carpentier, Theo D Palmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Neuroinflammation and autism: what have we learned so far?International journal of developmental disabilities · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular hallmarks of ageing in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pamela A CarpentierDepartment of Neurosurgery, 1201 Welch Road MSLS P320, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. pcarpent@stanford.edu
Theo D Palmer
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · US

Funding

Maternal Inflammation Alters Fetal Brain Development via Tumor necrosis Factor-alF32NS060427 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CARPENTIER, PAMELA ANN · 2008 to 2009
$63k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS060427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) lie at the heart of central nervous system development and repair, and deficiency or dysregulation of NSCs or their progeny can have significant consequences at any stage of life. Immune signaling is emerging as one of the influential variables that define resident NSC behavior. Perturbations in local immune signaling accompany virtually every injury or disease state, and signaling cascades that mediate immune activation, resolution, or chronic persistence influence resident stem and progenitor cells. Some aspects of immune signaling are beneficial, promoting intrinsic plasticity and cell replacement, while others appear to inhibit the very type of regenerative response that might restore or replace neural networks lost in injury or disease. Here we review known and speculative roles that immune signaling plays in the postnatal and adult brain, focusing on how environments encountered in disease or injury may influence the activity and fate of endogenous or transplanted NSCs.

Indexed as

Adult Stem CellsAnimalsBrainHumansNeuroimmunomodulationNeurons

Identifiers

PMID19840551
PMCPMC2789107
OpenAlexW2067214472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.