ArticleBMC health services research2009
Patient delay in cancer studies: a discussion of methods and measures.
Article in BMC health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of Surgical Delay on Breast Cancer Prognosis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Patient-reported measurement of time to diagnosis in cancer: development of the Cancer Symptom Interval Measure (C-SIM) and randomised controlled trial of method of delivery.BMC health services research · 2014Trial
- Patient personas of delayed healthcare-seeking behavior among patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Lung cancer care pathways and journeys: insights from patients at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico.BMC global and public health · 2026Article
- Determinants of Delayed Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A Sample From the Mohammed VI Center for Cancer Treatment, Morocco.Cureus · 2025Article
- 'I don't know what normal has been': a grounded theory exploration of the journey to endometriosis diagnosis.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- "Sepsis brought him to his knees": exploring the lived experiences and perspectives of sepsis survivors and family members to inform a sepsis public education campaign in Canada.BMC public health · 2025Article
- ChatGPT and oral cancer: a study on informational reliability.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Research Hotspots and Frontiers of Patient Delay: A Bibliometric Analysis from 2000 to 2023.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Early Diagnosis of Oral Cancer: A Complex Polyhedral Problem with a Difficult Solution.Cancers · 2023Review
- Breast self-examination practice and associated factors among women of reproductive age in southeast Ethiopia.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Pandemic delay: social implications and challenges for palliative care.Palliative care and social practice · 2023Article
- Article
- The relationship between internal and external factors about the outpatients' choice of hospital: A cross-sectional study from Jiaxing City, China.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Factors associated with cancer treatment delay: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Childhood Cancer Survival, 2006-2012 Cohorts of Mexican Institute of Social Security Beneficiaries at the Central-South Region of Mexico.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Time Taken for Symptom Recognition, First Consultation, Diagnosis and First Definitive Treatment and Its Associated Factors among Women with Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Impact of the Presenting Symptom on Time Intervals and Diagnostic Routes of Patients with Symptomatic Oral Cancer.Cancers · 2021Article
- Patient Interval and Associated Factors in the Diagnostic Journey of Oral Cancer: A Hospital-Based Cross-Sectional Study from Kerala, India.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is no validated way of measuring the prevalence and duration of patient delay, and we do not know how people perceive and define the time intervals they are asked to report in patient delay studies. This lack of a validated measure hampers research in patient delay and is counterproductive to efforts directed at securing early diagnosis of cancer. DISCUSSION: The main argument of the present paper is that current studies on patient delay do not sufficiently consider existing theories on symptom interpretation. It is illustrated that the interpretation of bodily sensations as symptoms related to a specific cancer diagnosis is embedded within a social and cultural context. We therefore cannot assume that respondents define delay periods in identical ways. SUMMARY: In order to improve the validity of patient delay studies, it is suggested that research be strengthened on three counts: More research should be devoted to symptom interpretation processes, more research should seek to operationalise patient delay, and, importantly, more research is needed to develop valid instruments for measuring patient delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.