Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19840191›Full record

ReviewJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2010

Assessment of tumour hypoxia for prediction of response to therapy and cancer prognosis.

Adrian M Jubb, Francesca M Buffa, Adrian L Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stemness-hypoxia genesTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functionalized Ultrasmall Iron Oxide Nanoparticles forMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian M JubbWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Francesca M Buffa
Adrian L Harris

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumour cells exploit both genetic and adaptive means to survive and proliferate in hypoxic microenvironments, resulting in the outgrowth of more aggressive tumour cell clones. Direct measurements of tumour oxygenation, and surrogate markers of the hypoxic response in tumours (for instance, hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha, carbonic anhydrase 9 and glucose transporter-1) are well-established prognostic markers in solid cancers. However, individual markers do not fully capture the complex, dynamic and heterogeneous hypoxic response in cancer. To overcome this, expression profiling has been employed to identify hypoxia signatures in cohorts or models of human cancer. Several of these hypoxia signatures have demonstrated prognostic significance in independent cancer datasets. Nevertheless, individual hypoxia markers have been shown to predict the benefit from hypoxia-modifying or anti-angiogenic therapies. This review aims to discuss the clinical impact of translational work on hypoxia markers and to explore future directions for research in this area.

Indexed as

Cell HypoxiaNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCarbonic AnhydrasesGene Expression ProfilingHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitKaplan-Meier EstimateMicroRNAsNecrosisPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCarbonic AnhydrasesHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID19840191
PMCPMC3837600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.