Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19840137›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2010

Has pay-for-performance decreased access for minority patients?

Andrew M Ryan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pay for performance for hospitals.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Patients' views on pay for performance in France: a qualitative study in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pay for obesity? Pay-for-performance metrics neglect increased complication rates and cost for obese patients.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew M RyanDepartment of Public Health, Weill Medical College-Cornell University, 402 East 67th Street, LA-215, New York, NY 10065, USA. amr2015@med.cornell.edu
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine whether the CMS and Premier Inc. Hospital Quality Incentive Demonstration (PHQID), a hospital-based pay-for-performance (P4P) and public quality reporting program, caused participating hospitals (1) to avoid treating minority patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia and (2) to avoid providing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to minority patients diagnosed with AMI. DATA SOURCES: One hundred percent Medicare inpatient claims, denominator files, and provider of service files from 2000 to 2006. STUDY

designWe test for differences in the conditional probability of receiving care at PHQID hospitals for AMI, heart failure, and pneumonia before and after implementation of the PHQID between white and minority patients. We also test for differences in the conditional probability that white and minority patients diagnosed with AMI receive CABG in hospitals participating, and not participating, in the PHQID before and after the implementation of the PHQID. DATA EXTRACTION

methodsData were obtained from CMS. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe find little evidence that the PHQID reduced access for minority patients: only "Other Race" beneficiaries had a significant reduction in adjusted admissions to PHQID hospitals in the postperiod, and only for AMI. Only marginally significant ( p<.10) evidence of a reduction in CABG was found, also occurring for Other Race beneficiaries.

conclusionsDespite minimal evidence of minority patient avoidance in the PHQID, monitoring of avoidance should continue for P4P programs.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesMinority GroupsReimbursement, IncentiveAgedAlgorithmsDatabases as TopicFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHeart FailureHospitalsHumansMaleMandatory ReportingMyocardial InfarctionPneumoniaProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID19840137
PMCPMC2813434
OpenAlexW2140012920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.