Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19839711›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology

Conservation of telomere protein complexes: shuffling through evolution.

Benjamin R Linger, Carolyn M Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolutionary relationship between yeast telomeric protein Cdc13 and Pot1.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structure ofRNA biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Identification and characterization of 5 walnutPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Telomeric Repeat-Binding Factor Homologs inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin R LingerDepartment of Cancer and Cell Biology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0521, USA.
Carolyn M Price
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Training Program in Cancer TherapeuticsT32CA117846 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PRICE, CAROLYN M, TAKIAR, VINITA · 2006 to 2022
$6.5M
TELOMERE STRUCTURE IN EUPLOTES CRASSUSR01GM041803 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI PRICE, CAROLYN M · 1995 to 2017
$4.8M
Function and Dynamics of Tetrahymena Telomere ProteinsR01GM088728 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PRICE, CAROLYN M · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
TELOMERE STRUCTURE IN EUPLOTES CRASSUSR29GM041803 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI PRICE, CAROLYN M · 1989 to 1993
–
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117846NIGMS NIH HHS GM041803NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041803NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of telomere proteins has hindered identification of orthologs from diverse species and created the impression that certain groups of eukaryotes have largely non-overlapping sets of telomere proteins. However, the recent identification of additional telomere proteins from various model organisms has dispelled this notion by expanding our understanding of the composition, architecture and range of telomere protein complexes present in individual species. It is now apparent that versions of the budding yeast CST complex and mammalian shelterin are present in multiple phyla. While the precise subunit composition and architecture of these complexes vary between species, the general function is often conserved. Despite the overall conservation of telomere protein complexes, there is still considerable species-specific variation, with some organisms having lost a particular subunit or even an entire complex. In some cases, complex components appear to have migrated between the telomere and the telomerase RNP. Finally, gene duplication has created telomere protein paralogs with novel functions. While one paralog may be part of a conserved telomere protein complex and have the expected function, the other paralog may serve in a completely different aspect of telomere biology.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsGenes, DuplicateHumansProtein BindingTelomereTelomere-Binding ProteinsTelomere-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19839711
PMCPMC2788028
OpenAlexW2010338357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.