ReviewAccounts of chemical research2009
Supramolecular interactions in chemomechanical polymers.
Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanochemical and machine-intelligent design of programmable materials: From molecular interactions to macroscale functionality.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Tailoring the Swelling-Shrinkable Behavior of Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Anion-Induced Reversible Actuation of Squaramide-Crosslinked Polymer Gels.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- The macroscopic shape of assemblies formed from microparticles based on host-guest interaction dependent on the guest content.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Competition between Intra and Intermolecular Triel Bonds. Complexes between Naphthalene Derivatives and Neutral or Anionic Lewis Bases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Recognition-Mediated Hydrogel Swelling Controlled by Interaction with a Negative Thermoresponsive LCST Polymer.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2016Article
- Smart Nanoscale Drug Delivery Platforms from Stimuli-Responsive Polymers and Liposomes.Macromolecules · 2013Article
- Multifunctional, biocompatible supramolecular hydrogelators consist only of nucleobase, amino acid, and glycoside.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular recognition is the basis for the operation of most biological functions; outside of nature, it has also been developed to a high degree of sophistication within the framework of supramolecular chemistry. More recently, selective noncovalent interactions, which constitute molecular recognition, are being used in intelligent new materials that transform chemical signals into actions, such as the release of drugs. The presence of supramolecular binding sites allows chemomechanical polymers to operate as sensors and actuators within a single unit without the need for any additional devices such as transducers or power supplies. A polymer can be designed so that a particular chemical substance, most often in aqueous surroundings, will trigger either a large expansion or a large contraction, depending on the mechanism. The translation of binding energy into mechanical motion can, with a suitable arrangement of the materials in tubes or on flexible films, be harnessed for unidirectional drives, flow control, the liberation of drugs, or the uptake of toxic compounds, among other applications. Miniaturization of the polymer particles allows one to enhance both the sensitivity and speed of the response, which is of particular importance in sensing. The basis for the selective response to external effector compounds, such as metal ions, amino acids, peptides, or nucleotides, is their noncovalent interaction with complementary functions covalently bound to the polymer network. With suitable polymers, selectivity between structural isomers, and even between enantiomers, as triggers can be achieved. As with supramolecular complexes in solution, the underlying interactions in polymers comprise a variety of noncovalent binding mechanisms, which are not easy to distinguish and quantify, and more so with polymers that are not monodisperse. In this Account, we present systematic comparisons of different polymers and effector classes that allow, for the first time, the characterization of these contributions in chemomechanical polymers: they comprise ion pairing, metal coordination, stacking, cation-pi, dispersive, and hydrophobic forces. In contrast, hydrogen bonding has a major role primarily in the hydrogel network structure itself. The fully reversible polymer volume changes are essentially determined by water uptake or release. In gels derived from boronic acid, glucose can serve as a cross-linking effector in promoting contractions via strong, reversible covalent bond formation in a highly distinctive manner. Cooperativity between two different effector compounds is more frequently seen with such polymers than in solution: it leads to logical AND gates by different motions of the particles, with a direct communication link to the outside world. For example, with a polymer that bears several recognition sites, triggering peptides induce motion only if Zn(2+) or Cu(2+) ions are simultaneously present. The molecular recognition mechanisms that cause volume changes in polymers share similarities with extensively studied supramolecular systems in solution, but there are also remarkable differences. In this Account, we bring the knowledge learned from solution studies to bear on our systematic analysis of polymeric systems in an effort to promote the effective harnessing of the forces involved in chemomechanical polymers and the smart materials that can be created with them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.