Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19838855›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2009

Breast, colorectal and prostate cancer screening for cancer survivors and non-cancer patients in community practices.

Shawna V Hudson, Karissa A Hahn, Pamela Ohman-Strickland, Regina S Cunningham, Suzanne M Miller, Benjamin F Crabtree

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Preventive care in older cancer survivors.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Screening and evaluation of antiparasitic and in vitro anticancer activities of Panamanian endophytic fungi.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2011
    Article
  19. Physician recommendation and patient adherence for colorectal cancer screening.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shawna V HudsonThe Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-2681, USA. hudsonsh@umdnj.edu
Karissa A Hahn
Pamela Ohman-Strickland
Regina S Cunningham
Suzanne M Miller
Benjamin F Crabtree
Johnson University · USEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Enhancing Colorectal CA Screening through Learning TeamsR01CA112387 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI CRABTREE, BENJAMIN F · 2005 to 2010
$2.9M
Integrating Practice & Community Cancer ControlK05CA140237 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI CRABTREE, BENJAMIN F · 2009 to 2013
$851k
Life After Cancer: Examining Survivor Transitions From Specialist to Primary CareK01CA131500 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI HUDSON, SHAWNA V. · 2008 to 2012
$641k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA131500NCI NIH HHS K05 CA140237NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer survivors have cancer surveillance and preventive screening needs that require monitoring. Little is known regarding their patterns of care in community primary care practices.

methodsSecondary analysis of 750 baseline patient surveys and medical record audits for patients ages 50+ years in 25 community-based primary care practices (N = 109 survivors and 641 noncancer patients).

resultsPatient self-reported screening rates for breast cancer (72%), colorectal cancer (81%) and prostate cancer (77%) were higher for cancer survivors compared to noncancer patients (69%, 67%, 53%, respectively). Screening rates documented in the primary care records were lower for all cancers. Cancer survivors were more likely than others to report having been screened for colorectal cancer (P = 0.002) even after excluding colorectal cancer survivors from the analysis (P = 0.034). Male cancer survivors were more likely to report being screened for prostate cancer than those without cancer (P < 0.001), even after excluding prostate cancer survivors (P = 0.020). There were no significant differences in either self-reported or medical record report of breast cancer screening rates among cancer survivors and noncancer patients.

conclusionsCancer survivors were more likely to self-report receipt of cancer screening than noncancer patients. Medical record reports of cancer screening were lower than self-reports for cancer survivors and noncancer patients. Identifying factors that affect cancer screening among cancer survivors is important and has implications for intervention design.

Indexed as

SurvivorsAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCommunity Health ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID19838855
PMCPMC2763158
OpenAlexW2067613596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.