ArticleDer Nervenarzt2009
[Equal access to medical services over the lifespan].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Demand for health services is in principle unlimited, in contrast to resources. People covered by public health funds in principle have equal access to treatment according to the highest level of medical evidence available. In order to restrict expenditure the legislator stipulates different instruments. These include reference pricing for generics as well as price capping. The legislator still shies from price fixing which is well established in other states. Instead, office-based physicians are confronted by law with rationing decisions concerning their own services as well as services prescribed where the mentally ill are at special risk of becoming victims of intransparency, as exemplified by the heterogeneity of the prescription of psychotropic drugs. A systematic prioritization approach following internationally available models might open new perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19838664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.